From: | "J. Keith Henry" <Ereskanti@***.COM> |
---|---|
Subject: | Back off of Barbie Please (Re: silly edges and dumb flaws) |
Date: | Fri, 6 Feb 1998 17:24:15 EST |
writes:
> LOL! The problem is that at some point the char shouldn't be able to
> improve anymore. But would a kind of "constant" char be that much fun?
> Same with the shaper/cyber thing. If the rest of the group is at that
> powerlevel (And I assume they are), the (logical) cyber-rejection would
> have left the char at the losing end (And from what I know, Barbie doesn't
> the people-always-lose-approach).
> What do you do, when you have everything?
>
> Tobias Berghoff a.k.a Zixx a.k.a. Charon, your friendly werepanther physad.
>
You walk around and discover you aren't at the end of the spectrum yet.
Barbie plays the way she does, and I will not ever fault her for that. Now
how everyone else plays is something else entirely...Us???
We've got magics in the game that can alleviate recuperative powers (Regen
Stasis) and we have ways of making Cyberware that is so keyed into a person,
that it will function with a shaper even (completely HOUSE RULE of course).
Even the 'flaws' of Bio-rejection can be circumvented if you have the
patience, resources or power (or some combination of the three) to pull it
off.
The only thing to remember is "Is everyone still having fun?"
-K