Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Zachariah Hoffman zhoffman@*.arizona.edu
Subject: Ballot Results - Stupid Question
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 1999 08:30:21 -0700
"Ryan W. Bolduan" wrote:
>
> On Wed, 7 Apr 1999 Airwasp@***.com wrote:
>
> > On roughly the same topic, but a little different, only 38 people have done
> > anything with the RN Shirt survey on HHH to get information to begin getting
> > a basis for cost, colors, and things of that nature.

> > -Herc
> >

What's (or rather, where's) HHH?
--

***************************************************
Zachariah Hoffman
Support Systems Analyst zhoffman@*.arizona.edu
UA College of Medicine www.lrc.arizona.edu/ZachH
Learning Resource Center
***************************************************
Message no. 2
From: Airwasp@***.com Airwasp@***.com
Subject: Ballot Results - Stupid Question
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 1999 00:45:46 EDT
In a message dated 4/7/1999 10:29:45 AM US Eastern Standard Time,
zhoffman@*.arizona.edu writes:

> "Ryan W. Bolduan" wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 7 Apr 1999 Airwasp@***.com wrote:
> >
> > > On roughly the same topic, but a little different, only 38 people have
> done
> > > anything with the RN Shirt survey on HHH to get information to begin
> getting
> > > a basis for cost, colors, and things of that nature.
>
> > > -Herc
> > >
>
> What's (or rather, where's) HHH?

For those of you who do not know, to get to HHH, or Hoosier Hacker House,
there are one of two ways:

1. Go to the Shadowrun Archive, go to the links section and HHH will be
there somewhere;

or,

2. type in the following: members.aol.com/hhackerh/intro.htm

Your web browser should add in the http part in front, as I most of the time
don't bother to put it in front of mine.

-Herc

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Ballot Results - Stupid Question, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.