Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Can I play with madness <MKNABUSCH@******.BITNET>
Subject: Re: (blank) Horrors and Runners
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 1994 14:19:17 -0500
Sheepherder, you really don't want to do that.
The closest that FASA ever got to putting a
horror in Shadowrun (so far) was in the module
'Ivy and Chrome'. The runners never see it.
and only the gm can piece it together if he has
read earthdawn. Horrors and runners *shudder*.
Nope. Bad idea there. The magic needed to rid
a horror is not readily available to ANYONE in
Srun.
Just my HO.
Michael
aka Harlequin
Message no. 2
From: "Matthew P. Sims" <SIMSM%AM.mrgate@*****.UML.EDU>
Subject: Re: (blank) Horrors and Runners
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 1994 15:58:15 EST
I thought that there was a 2nd Harlequin adventure that had the runners going
after a Horror? This is what I heard from some other well knowledged SR GMs.


(-sheepherder-) /--\
\| |
/
|
|
|
Message no. 3
From: "C. Paul Douglas" <granite@*****.NET>
Subject: Re: (blank) Horrors and Runners
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 1994 17:06:10 -0500
On Wed, 23 Mar 1994, Matthew P. Sims wrote:

> I thought that there was a 2nd Harlequin adventure that had the runners going
> after a Horror? This is what I heard from some other well knowledged SR GMs.
>
According to my sources..Harliquin 2 is supposed to be out at
GENCON...Plot is unknown..Although I had heard that whatever it is about
is supposed to keep the Horrors at bay a while longer....
----------------------GRANITE
Message no. 4
From: Can I play with madness <MKNABUSCH@******.BITNET>
Subject: Re: (blank) Horrors and Runners
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 1994 00:27:06 -0500
There is supposed to be another adventure...
but as to when it comes out...is anyones guess.
Michael
aka Harlequin

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about (blank) Horrors and Runners, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.