| From: | "Gurth" <gurth@******.nl> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Bug City (was: Good/Bad Published Adventures) |
| Date: | Fri, 12 Apr 1996 22:15:48 +0100 |
> Okay, okay--a module *and* a sourcebook, then.
I agree with you here.
> What I didn't like was
> that they took a perfectly good story and wasted it on "Burning Bright"--
> not that I didn't like the novel (I did--it was one of my favorites)
I liked the story, but not the way it was worked out... IMHO it could have
been handled much better, especially the writing part.
> but I wanted *our* team to be the ones who went through it, not some
> bunch of fiction characters. I'm trying to get my GM to adapt the
> story into a module, but he has so little free time that he won't do it.
IMHO Bug City should have been a sourcebook with a small adventure in it,
one aimed either at long-term residents of the CZ, or one that is set just
a few days after the wall went up. As it is now, as a GM you have to
improvise everything, and I for one like to see one or two published
adventures for a game system just so I get some ideas as to what they are
intended to be.
--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
Can I use these condoms on the continent, or do I need a European adaptor?
-> NERPS Project Leader & Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
-> The Character Mortuary: http://huizen.dds.nl/~mortuary/mortuary.html <-
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.1:
GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+ PE
Y PGP- t(+) 5+ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b+@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
