Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: "Arno R. Lehmann" <arlehma@***.NET>
Subject: Fwd: Re: Buh Bye! & *Question
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 1997 02:45:15 +0100
On Wed, 22 Jan 1997 01:47:20 +0100 "Arno R. Lehmann" <arlehma@***.net>
writes:
>On Tue, 21 Jan 1997 10:25:37 -0600, Michael Broadwater wrote:
>
>>At 04:51 PM 1/21/97 +0100, Hannes Lundholm wrote:
>>>> Ehhh????
>>>> What is this "real life"? Some new RPG I've not heard about????
>>>
>>>Yeah! And it's supposed to be _real cool_! I've heard people talk
>about it
>>>for quite some time now, so it oughtta get out soon. But it's
>really,
>>>really cool. You have stuff like girlfriends, work, food, sleep, and
>all
>>>that cool stuff in it! No magic though, thats a shame... Well, I'm
>gonna
>>>buy it for sure!!!
>>
>>Food? I thought that was still in alpha testing. And sleep. Sure.
>>Right. That's just an industry rumor.
>>
>Does anyone out there know if there will be a computer "real life" game?
>I think it sounds worth trying it!
>
>-- Arno
>

Any news if it will come out with LARP rules? It might be just the thing
to try live!

(Although, like always, you'd have to be careful not to spook people by
running around talking about things like "girlfriends", "Work",
"food",
and "sleep" out in public...we don't want another one of those
bad-publicity for RPG's stories coming back on the news...)

~Tim


===================END FORWARDED MESSAGE===================

I Think I've got a problem: My Messages come up on the list with my
mail-address as reply-to-address.
Of course I don't want to change my reply-to-address to that of the list.
Just leaving the reply-to filed in the mailer's settings blank doesn't
work.
Reading the listserv refcard didn't help any.

Does anyone know what could help?
Perhaps the list operator / owner?

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Buh Bye! & *Question, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.