Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Marc Renouf renouf@********.com
Subject: Called Shots and Target Number Modifiers
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 11:09:28 -0400 (EDT)
On Tue, 15 Jun 1999, Ken wrote:

> No Sam worth the name would be without a smartlinked weapon (-2). If
> you want to get fancy, the laser sight knocks off another (-1).

Actually, laser sights are incompatible with smartlinks. You can
use one or the other, but not both.

> Depending on whether or not your GM will allow image magnification to be
> used with smartlink, your initial target number will be lower.

I do, but only with certain restrictions (we have a house rule
that governs the use of cyber image mag and smartlinks).

> Put a large and solid object between you and unfriendly fire (adds +8
> to the opposing target number) and aim some more.

...except that +8 cover adds +4 to *your* target numbers as well,
which makes your aim less useful unless you have a skill higher than 8.

> Then take into account the number of dice you have for combat pool.
> pretty much regardless of the weapon you're using, all it would take is
> a single hit to take the target out of the action.

You'd be surprised. At a target number of 10 (which is easy to
get to), a person with a weapon skill of six, dumping in 6 combat pool is
(statistically speaking) going to get *one* success. If the target has
any dodge available at all, it is likely that this will actually be a
miss. The it doesn't matter how much damage the weapon you're using
inflicts, as you haven't actually hit anything.

Marc

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Called Shots and Target Number Modifiers, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.