Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: lordmountainlion@***.rr.com (Scott)
Subject: Can concussion grenades really damage vehicles?
Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 05:18:05 -0600
'Would you MIND not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons please?'



According to Scott, on Sunday 30 May 2004 03:46 the word on the street
was...

> I believe they were 10,000 cycles of sound

"Cycles of sound"...? IIRC flashbangs tend to be 150+ dB, but I've never

heard of a measurement called a "cycle"...

[>]
[>] Hey I'm going off what they taught us for the winter Olympics in
Korea in 88/89 been a while. Pretty sure the guy said cycles.

However, in SR, the closest thing to flashbangs are probably the flash
and
superflash grenades, not concussion grenades.

[>] Thunderflash.

There's also a grenade I read about in Janes lie your talking about the
blast grenade. You slip a sleeve of prefragmented wire in a plastic or
like wise shell around it. Two components for one grenade can be made
for the mission.

Scott
Message no. 2
From: lordmountainlion@***.rr.com (Scott)
Subject: Can concussion grenades really damage vehicles?
Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 06:01:27 -0600
I think the interesting question that could solve this answer and make
for
some amusing antics on the part of your gamers would be "Is the grenade
small enough that it could be crammed down the gas tank?"


Just my .02¥
The Mad Kilted Cyberzombie GM
[>]
There was an Italian (I think) micro grenade, could fit 2 of them in
your hand. Scary though.

Scott
'Would you MIND not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons please?'
_________________________________________________________________
Best Restaurant Giveaway Ever! Vote for your favorites for a chance to
win
$1 million! http://local.msn.com/special/giveaway.asp

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Can concussion grenades really damage vehicles?, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.