From: | runnerpaul@*****.com runnerpaul@*****.com |
---|---|
Subject: | CG vs. CGI (and overloaded TLAs) |
Date: | Thu, 29 Apr 1999 11:58:47 -0400 (EDT) |
At 02:28 AM 4/29/1999 -0500, Michael Orion Jackson wrote:
>;^) Not to be a butt
Too late. ;)
>but I LOL when I saw the part in the
>messages about CGI special effects (CGI to me is Common Gateway
Interface,
>a la www.someserver.com/cgi-bin/somescript.cgi). I think the rendered
>cinema effects are reffered to as CG (Computer Generated, natch).
Well, that's what _you_ think, and while I have heard references to CG
effects, it's just as common to hear them referred to as CGI which
stands for Computer Generated Images. (This is an example of
overloading of a TLA.) In the past year or two, the usage of just the
letters CG has become more common, it hasn't replaced the three letter
version just yet.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.0.2
iQCVAwUBNyiA0qPbvUVI86rNAQFPngP7BTufBiLtjrmmniwS26H+Auz/PO5X6UlA
YZQK6Puv1YGhgay//zHkSwCYa4w7PhMIf0Lju7/hjaJk6QhNhh50LKcfPZpxaCCt
c4us1hTI/qpivXw/Lp4TXD6tmonC92++uTR+v/XKUwwS9BECKFHuuv4708puoHZ0
4n+lK7PZQnM=Z7s6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
-- Paul Gettle, #970 of 1000 (RunnerPaul@*****.com)
PGP Fingerprint, Key ID:0x48F3AACD (RSA 1024, created 98/06/26)
C260 94B3 6722 6A25 63F8 0690 9EA2 3344
---------------------------------------------------
Get free personalized email at http://www.iname.com