Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: shadowrn@*********.com (Max Belankov)
Subject: Chronology question
Date: Thu May 3 01:00:01 2001
Hello,

Could someone give me date and time (as exact as possible) of Cermak
Blast?

--
Best regards,
Max mailto:belank@***.ru
Message no. 2
From: shadowrn@*********.com (Damion Milliken)
Subject: Chronology question
Date: Thu May 3 01:30:01 2001
Max Belankov writes:

> Could someone give me date and time (as exact as possible) of Cermak
> Blast?

Bug City lists it as "August 1st, early morning". Based upon a quick scan
of Burning Bright, it was probably closer to 10am or so. This is based upon
the fact that Kyle Teller woke up, travelled for an hour, showered,
travelled for another hour, had a meeting, travelled again, and observed the
strike on the main hive. Unless he woke up at some crazily early hour, then
the detonation couldn't have been earlier than 8am, and was likely closer to
10am. I can read the chapters carefully and try to determine a timeline
that's more accurate, if you like.

--
Damion Milliken University of Wollongong
Unofficial Shadowrun Guru E-mail: dam01@***.edu.au
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GE d- s++:-- a24 C++ US++>+++ P+ L++>+++ E- W+>++ N++ o@ K- w+(--) O-@
M-- V- PS+ PE(-) Y+>++ PGP-@>++ t+ 5 X++>+++ R+(++) !tv(--) b+ DI+++@
D G+ e++>++++$ h(*) r++ y-(--)
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Message no. 3
From: shadowrn@*********.com (Sebastian Wiers)
Subject: Chronology question
Date: Thu May 3 08:45:01 2001
>Could someone give me date and time (as exact as possible) of Cermak
>Blast?

According to "Bug City", early in the morning (think "pre-dawn raid")
of
September 1, 2055.

Burning Bright might have a more "down to the minute" time.

The Shadowrun Archives timeline explorere is also good for that sort of
thing.

-Mongoose

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Chronology question, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!