Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Blaze <Blaze@********.DEMON.CO.UK>
Subject: Dallas and Doc's trousers :)
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 1996 04:34:57 +0100
In article <m0vD9cr-0004wlC@*******.Informatik.Uni-Oldenburg.DE>, Sascha
Pabst <Sascha.Pabst@**********.UNI-OLDENBURG.DE> writes
>On 15 Oct 96 at 2:05, Blaze wrote:
>[snip]
>> Now that would be telling wouldn't it :) After all the person might
>> want it back one day, and it wouldn't be so much fun to let them know
>> who's got it :) But if you really really want to know, ask Dallas :)
>Is he (?) on?

Dallas, like me is a lurker, he also unfortunately has to use Pete's
account (saves us the bother of having to pay for one) <grin> but don't
tell Pete that <bigger grin>

He's here somewhere, but usually only at weekends :)

>> By the way Jonathan (Doc) how's the underwear problem, still getting it
>> caught in your zipper :)
>> Pete (owner of mailer) wants to know if Jonathans trousers have regained
>> their normal shape yet? :)
>I must say, you really seem to have ... strange gaming sessions... :-)

Very strange .. :) :)

>Pleased to see you back, Blaze. *offers a cup of tea*

Nice to be back Sascha, but what's the point in offering me a cup of
tea, when I don't know what it is or what to do with it..... OH NO!!!

You are not geting me onto that one again :)

Blaze

Blaze
________ ______ _______ ________________
___ __ )___ / ___ |___ /___ ____/
__ __ |__ / __ /| |__ / __ __/
_ /_/ / _ /____ ___ |_ /___ /___
/_____/ /_____//_/ |_|/____//_____/
Open your door to a fine day, but make yourself ready for a foul one.

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Dallas and Doc's trousers :), you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.