Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Rob Ingersoll <RINGERSO@*****.EDU>
Subject: Deckers and Silencers
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 1994 22:52:00 CDT
I have been lurking around here for about 2 months now and decided
this is a good time to make my first post.

First off, is there any truth to the 2-liter bottle silencer for
.22s? (As seen in a Steven Segal movie (The one in Alaska))

Also, I play deckers quite a bit. I agree that while they are in the
matrix, the rest of the game grinds to a halt, but my group has come
up with a second solution rather than pizza runs. The ever popular
SNES!


LATER

****************************************************************
* KNIGHTSKY * If you ever lose your way-- *
* aka ringerso@*****.edu * Look to the KNIGHTSKY for asistance *
****************************************************************
Message no. 2
From: Stainless Steel Rat <ratinox@***.NEU.EDU>
Subject: Deckers and Silencers
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 1994 22:56:26 -0500
>>>>> "Rob" == Rob Ingersoll <RINGERSO@*****.EDU> writes:

Rob> First off, is there any truth to the 2-liter bottle silencer for
Rob> .22s? (As seen in a Steven Segal movie (The one in Alaska))

Yes, putting a bottle on the muzzle does work. For about one or two shots
and then it's useless.

Rob> Also, I play deckers quite a bit. I agree that while they are in the
Rob> matrix, the rest of the game grinds to a halt, but my group has come
Rob> up with a second solution rather than pizza runs. The ever popular
Rob> SNES!

Whatever works :).

--
Rat <ratinox@***.neu.edu> |When not in use, Happy Fun Ball should be
http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/ratinox|returned to its special container and kept
PGP Public Key: Ask for one today! |under refrigeration.

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Deckers and Silencers, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!