Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Demosthenes Three demosthenes_3@*****.com
Subject: Desperetely seeking w--dchuck
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 17:14:41 -0400
> From: "James Mick" <sinabian@********.net>
> To: <shadowrn@*********.com>
> Subject: Desperately Seeking Woodchuck
>
> Okay, so anyone wanna throw me a bone and tell me wut the subject line was
> at least? ::bez hopeful::

Nope.
No way. More than my life is worth.
It was bad.
Check the FAQ. It think W--dch-cks are on the list of forbidden topics. ;-)

(Try the logs from 1996 IIRC - look for anything Bull wrote)

Demosthenes Three
demosthenes_3@*****.com


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
Message no. 2
From: SyphonAC@***.com SyphonAC@***.com
Subject: Desperetely seeking w--dchuck
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 01:43:06 EDT
In a message dated 7/27/00 9:21:35 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
demosthenes_3@*****.com writes:

> Nope.
> No way. More than my life is worth.
> It was bad.
> Check the FAQ. It think W--dch-cks are on the list of forbidden topics. ;-)
>
> (Try the logs from 1996 IIRC - look for anything Bull wrote)
>
> Demosthenes Three
> demosthenes_3@*****.com

And as much maligned as the noble woodchuck is, it's apparently not [OT]....I
had no idea the woodchuck and the world of Shadowrun were so closely
intertwined...you know, come to think of it, one of my computer engineering
buddies once found a program to calculate how much wood could be chucked by
any given woodchuck, all you had to do was punch in the parameters....maybe
it's time I had him find that...hehehe...

Syphon

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Desperetely seeking w--dchuck, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!