Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Iridios iridios@*****.com
Subject: Detection spells (was Re: Anchoring confusion)
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 23:50:38 -0400
Sebastian Wiers wrote:
>
> From: Iridios <iridios@*****.com>
>
> :> Again, why bother? More sucesses with ANY detection spell reveals more
> :> specific info about the object detected. 2 succeses should be enough to
> :> indicate rough speed, ans in "lethally fast" or "sitting in that
guys
> pocket
> :> slow". They added that nice table on p. 192- why not use it?
> :
> :I'm under the impression that the table is used more for the Analyze
> :series of spells. The Detect Object spell states that the subject
> :detects all of a specified type of object within range of the sense
> :and knows their number and relative location. Which is all detection
> :really is. Analyzation covers gaining specific information and would
> :benefit from the added successes.
> :
> :Besides why (not to mention how) would an object that has a Detect
> :Bullet spell need to know detailed information about the bullet?
> :Either it's a bullet or not. :)
>
> Well, its certainly handy in the case of "detect life" or "detect
> enemies"- again, I think those are inteded to tell you how nasty your enemy
> is, what sort of life form is in the ares, etc. If you use a "detect guns"
> spell, knowing the type of gun would be nice. I would think that yes, I'd
> want to know what type of bullet I was detecting, and especially if it was
> pointed in my direction and maybe moving...

I think you and I are going to have to agree to disagree on this
point. But I want to make one final statement. It is my firm belief
that detection spells are just that detectors, not analyzers. They
work in the same function that a metal detector does. After the
detection has been made, it is then up to the operator to analyze or
act on that which has been detected.

--
Iridios
--
If you are reading this,
you are too close to your monitor.

Visit "The ShadowZone"
http://members.xoom.com/Iridios/ShadowZone

Sig by Kookie Jar 5.97d http://go.to/generalfrenetics/
11:38:18 PM/257:00:01 (1) [no thud]

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Detection spells (was Re: Anchoring confusion), you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.