Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Spider Murphy <crickel@***.EDU>
Subject: Digest version? [OT]
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 1998 19:55:14 -0600
Is there a digest version of this list? That would be SOOOO useful!

Spider Murphy
Message no. 2
From: Spike <u5a77@*****.CS.KEELE.AC.UK>
Subject: Re: Digest version? [OT]
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 13:33:16 +0000
And verily, did Spider Murphy hastily scribble thusly...

|Is there a digest version of this list? That would be SOOOO useful!

Of course there is.

e-mail listserv@********.itribe.net
subject:none
body text: help

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|u5a77@*****.cs.keele.ac.uk| Windows95 (noun): 32 bit extensions and a |
| | graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit |
|Andrew Halliwell | operating system originally coded for a 4 bit |
|Principal Subjects in:- |microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company, that|
|Comp Sci & Electronics | can't stand 1 bit of competition. |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|GCv3.1 GCS/EL>$ d---(dpu) s+/- a- C++ U N++ o+ K- w-- M+/++ PS+++ PE- Y t+ |
|5++ X+/++ R+ tv+ b+ D G e>PhD h/h+ !r! !y-|I can't say F**K either now! :( |
Message no. 3
From: David Buehrer <dbuehrer@******.CARL.ORG>
Subject: Re: Digest version? [OT]
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 07:21:44 -0700
Spike wrote:
/
/ And verily, did Spider Murphy hastily scribble thusly...
/
/ |Is there a digest version of this list? That would be SOOOO useful!
/
/ Of course there is.
/
/ e-mail listserv@********.itribe.net
^
You were so close :)

listserv@********.itribe.net

Leave the subject blank

Send the message: set shadowrn digests

-David
--
ShadowRN GridSec
email: dbuehrer@******.carl.org
http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/1068/homepage.htm

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Digest version? [OT], you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!