Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Doctor Doom <JCH8169@*****.TAMU.EDU>
Subject: Dual Smartlinks
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1993 13:12:37 -0500
On dual Smartlinks...

If we were to envoke the often stated quality about ShadowRun: "It's supposed
to be cinematic." then we could proceed along these lines:

In most westerns were one sees a Gun Fighter armed with dual pistols, one
should note that *generally* he fires them in tandem: left, right, left, et
cetera, rather than simultaneously.

This could be recreated by being armed with two guns (and two SmartLinks) and
firing with either weapon during their initiative phase, and therefore
utilizing both Simple Action, as was mentioned in the original posting.

It strikes me this could be permitted, provided you were bringing both weapons
to bear upon a single target. Endeavoring to track two targets simulaneously
falls within the purview of Tactical Computers (allowances could possibly be
made for Encephalons...but I would not encourage this).


Of course, then the Munchkin complains to the Game Master, "But, but, I
put soo much money in to two guns and smartlinks! What good are they if
I can't use 'em at the same time! I can get the same effect with ONE
gun, for half the price!"

The Game Master smiles, and states, "Well, you have two ammunition
deposits from which to draw. You can't do that with one gun."


Were one to implement such a system, I would also apply recoil to the hand that
fired the weapon, respectively. Moreover, I would reject any attempts to
negate recoil by juggling the weapon from one hand to the other.

[ Actually, this issue has surfaced within my campaign. A veteran character,
before it was ruled that dual, simultaneous Smartlink utilization bestowed no
benefits, was created equipped in such a fashion. With the prospect of
bringing the "Old Guard" back for a "Special Edition" run, this issue
had to be
tackled. Obviously, stripping the character of one Smartlink was not an
appealing solution... We settled upon the two Simple Action approach mentioned
above. ]



Colonel Count von Hohenzollern und von Doom, DMSc, DSc, PhD.

Doom Technologies & Weapon Systems -- Dark Thought Publications
>>> Working on solutions best left in the dark.
<<<
[ Doctor Doom : jch8169@********.tamu.edu ]
^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^
"Attack, attack, and when in doubt, ATTACK!" -- Frederick the Great of Prussia
Message no. 2
From: "Jason Carter, Nightstalker" <CARTER@***.EDU>
Subject: Re: Dual Smartlinks
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1993 12:15:42 -0700
Doctor Doom Said:

>>On dual Smartlinks...

>>[Bunch of deleted stuff]<<

>>It strikes me this could be permitted, provided you were bringing both weapons
>>to bear upon a single target. Endeavoring to track two targets simulaneously
>>falls within the purview of Tactical Computers (allowances could possibly be
>>made for Encephalons...but I would not encourage this).

One more reason to try to stuff that horridly Essence Expensive item into your
samurai. As for Encephalons, I think that most people overstate the effect of
the item. The "multi-tasking" capabilities are reflecting in the increased
intelligence and Task Pool you get.

>>[More deleted stuff]<<

>>Were one to implement such a system, I would also apply recoil to the hand
>>that fired the weapon, respectively. Moreover, I would reject any attempts to
>>negate recoil by juggling the weapon from one hand to the other.

Do you mean that, you could fire each weapon once, using a simple action for
each individual shot, and since you only fired a particular weapon once, there
is no recoil mod on the second shot? That makes sense.

See Ya in Shadows,
Jason J Carter
The Nightstalker

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Dual Smartlinks, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.