Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Avenger <Avenger@*******.DEMON.CO.UK>
Subject: Dunky's death was - re: Postings to the List
Date: Tue, 6 May 1997 03:13:47 +0100
In article <Pine.ULT.3.95.970505204634.26653A-100000@*****.wheaton.edu>,
"Q (not from Star Trek)" <Scott.E.Meyer@*******.EDU> rambled on
endlessly about Postings to the List [my two p...]
>On Mon, 5 May 1997, Fisher, Victor wrote:
>
>[snip]
>
>> Oh, by the way, I know who REALLY killed Dunkelzahn...

Yeah yeah yeah... smart arse <g>

>Let me guess. It was Bob. :)

Bob the Squooshy ball? Or Bob Holness (sorry Brit joke)

Actually it was a conspiracy of corporations. The corp's understood
only too well the threat that Dunky posed to their strangelhold on trade
and big business. Dunky's fascination with humankind, lent him a
sympathetic mind to the troubles of normal people, therefore, the corps
decided to off him before the silly dragon got into his elected office
properly. They of course used their connections within government to
achieve it, Dunky had plenty of enemies there, after all, who wants an
all-powerful unpredictable dragon telling one what to do? And of course
there were a few of the nation's organised crime chappies in on the
scam, so there you go, the UCAS nation killed dunklezahn, those who
voted for him are as guilty as those who killed him.

The strange black tentacled thing? A simple illusion cast by the circle
of power that killed him.

Lack of security guards and dragon type debris... Some spells are
capable of total obliteration as are some weapons. Poor old dunky just
got too big for his boots, and had to be stomped. Serves the Dunky fans
right for voting for him if you ask me.



My opinion is mine, and mine alone. It is not intended as a flame or as
an attitude of right and wrong, it is and always will be, simply *my*
_opinion_ :)

--
__ \ | \ __
| | _` | __| | / _ \ \ / _ \ __ \ _` | _ \ __|
| | ( | | < ___ \ \ / __/ | | ( | __/ |
____/ \__,_|_| _|\_\ _/ _\ \_/ \___|_| _|\__, |\___|_|
A Dark Shadow in a Dark World |___/
Web page at: http://www.shalako.demon.co.uk
Message no. 2
From: tom Cone <Brother-1@*****.NET>
Subject: Re: Dunky's death was - re: Postings to the List
Date: Tue, 6 May 1997 15:04:50 -1000
>Those who voted for him are as guilty as those >who killed him.
Are you telling me that I'm responsible for the death of a Greater
Western Dragon?

Cool. I'll be the envy of all my friends.

Brother-1. Decker for hire.
>Visit Dot's Deck Technologies! Just north of the Sea-TAC!
Message no. 3
From: "Q (not from Star Trek)" <Scott.E.Meyer@*******.EDU>
Subject: Re: Dunky's death was - re: Postings to the List
Date: Tue, 6 May 1997 20:04:33 -0500
On Tue, 6 May 1997, Avenger wrote:

> In article <Pine.ULT.3.95.970505204634.26653A-100000@*****.wheaton.edu>,
> "Q (not from Star Trek)" <Scott.E.Meyer@*******.EDU> rambled on
> endlessly about Postings to the List [my two p...]
> >On Mon, 5 May 1997, Fisher, Victor wrote:
> >
> >[snip]
> >
> >> Oh, by the way, I know who REALLY killed Dunkelzahn...
>
> Yeah yeah yeah... smart arse <g>
>
> >Let me guess. It was Bob. :)
>
> Bob the Squooshy ball? Or Bob Holness (sorry Brit joke)
[snip]

Doesn't anyone remember Twin Peaks anymore?

-Q

---------------------------------------
I dislike Windows95 for the same reason people dislike New Coke
It tastes disgustingly like Pepsi.

Scott "Q" Meyer
Scott.E.Meyer@*******.edu
http://johnh.wheaton.edu/~smeyer
Message no. 4
From: GRANITE <granite@**.NET>
Subject: Re: Dunky's death was - re: Postings to the List
Date: Tue, 6 May 1997 19:33:30 -0700
> From: "Q (not from Star Trek)" <Scott.E.Meyer@*******.EDU>
> Doesn't anyone remember Twin Peaks anymore?

Now that you jog my memory..I do :) And I agree...
--------------------------------GRANITE "Rock Steady"
=====================================================
Lord, Grant Me The Serenity To Accept The Things I Cannot Change,
The Courage To Change The Things I Can,
And The Wisdom To Hide The Bodies Of Those People I Had To Kill
Because They Pissed Me Off.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ShadowRunner's Serenity Prayer
Message no. 5
From: Spike <u5a77@*****.CS.KEELE.AC.UK>
Subject: Re: Dunky's death was - re: Postings to the List
Date: Wed, 7 May 1997 10:22:09 +0100
|Bob the Squooshy ball? Or Bob Holness (sorry Brit joke)

"I'll have a pee please Bob....."
--
______________________________________________________________________________
|u5a77@*****.cs.keele.ac.uk| "Are you pondering what I'm pondering Pinky?" |
|Andrew Halliwell | |
|Principal subjects in:- | "I think so brain, but this time, you control |
|Comp Sci & Electronics | the Encounter suit, and I'll do the voice..." |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|GCv3.1 GCS/EL>$ d---(dpu) s+/- a- C++ U N++ o+ K- w-- M+/++ PS+++ PE- Y t+ |
|5++ X+/++ R+ tv+ b+ D G e>PhD h/h+ !r! !y-|I can't say F**K either now! :( |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Message no. 6
From: Spike <u5a77@*****.CS.KEELE.AC.UK>
Subject: Re: Dunky's death was - re: Postings to the List
Date: Wed, 7 May 1997 10:23:39 +0100
|Doesn't anyone remember Twin Peaks anymore?

It's repeating on Channel 5 at the moment...
(Didn't watch it the first time though, and not gonna watch in now....)

--
______________________________________________________________________________
|u5a77@*****.cs.keele.ac.uk| "Are you pondering what I'm pondering Pinky?" |
|Andrew Halliwell | |
|Principal subjects in:- | "I think so brain, but this time, you control |
|Comp Sci & Electronics | the Encounter suit, and I'll do the voice..." |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|GCv3.1 GCS/EL>$ d---(dpu) s+/- a- C++ U N++ o+ K- w-- M+/++ PS+++ PE- Y t+ |
|5++ X+/++ R+ tv+ b+ D G e>PhD h/h+ !r! !y-|I can't say F**K either now! :( |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Dunky's death was - re: Postings to the List, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.