Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Ray & Tamara Macey <macey@*******.COM.AU>
Subject: Echo?
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 20:05:17 +1100
I used to get my own messages echoed back, but now I do not. Could someone
please tell me why this is. Is there any way I can change it?

Thanks
Ray.
Message no. 2
From: Dvixen <dvixen@********.COM>
Subject: Re: Echo?
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 03:09:43 -0800
----------
> From: Ray & Tamara Macey <macey@*******.COM.AU>
> To: SHADOWRN@********.ITRIBE.NET
> Subject: Echo?
> Date: Thursday, January 23, 1997 01:05
>
> I used to get my own messages echoed back, but now I do not. Could
someone
> please tell me why this is. Is there any way I can change it?

send to listserv@********.itribe.net

(no subject, as per usual)

set shadowrn repro

(or if you want only acknowledgement that the post made it,
set shadowrn ack )

--

Dvixen dvixen@********.com
"And I thought First Ones were rare." - Ivanova - Babylon 5
The opinions expressed are those of the myriad voices in my head
Message no. 3
From: Drekhead <drekhead@***.NET>
Subject: Echo
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 14:40:17 +0000
Is there anybody out there?


====DREKHEAD==============================================================
Tim Kerby | Never relax. Your run may be over, but someone,
drekhead@***.net |somewhere, is just starting his and the target
drekhead@***.com | could be you.
drekhead@*******.com | ---http://users.aol.com/drekhead/home.html---
=========================================================================
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GB d-(+) s: a C++(+++)>++++$ U--- P L+ E? W++>$ N o? K-? w+()>--- O++>$ M--
V? PS+ PE++ Y PGP- t++>$ 5 X+ R+ tv+ b++ DI++(+) D++ G e>++ h--- r+++ y+++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Echo?, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.