Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: jzealey@***.edu.au (James Zealey)
Subject: Email bounces
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 08:57:08 +1100
Hi guys - I finally managed to get myself back on the list from a stable
email. I'm guessing I missed something in the intervening week or so though.
Can anyone tell my why I'm getting emails back from
shadowrn-bounce@*****.dumpshock.com with "unprocessed", "discarded"
and
"ignored" sections in them? I'm guessing that emails are being vetted,
and that the only ones let through are those which either contain a
single message, or a single quote block followed by a response - is that
right? Is there anything else I need to watch out for being bounced?

James (formerly incubus)
Message no. 2
From: Gurth@******.nl (Gurth)
Subject: Email bounces
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 10:59:42 +0100
According to James Zealey, on Mon, 28 Oct 2002 the word on the street was...

> Hi guys - I finally managed to get myself back on the list from a stable
> email. I'm guessing I missed something in the intervening week or so
> though. Can anyone tell my why I'm getting emails back from
> shadowrn-bounce@*****.dumpshock.com with "unprocessed",
"discarded" and
> "ignored" sections in them?

I have no idea, but Mark, Adam or Graht should probably be able to tell
you, I suppose...

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
I know all this and more
-> Probably NAGEE Editor * ShadowRN GridSec * Triangle Virtuoso <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://plastic.dumpshock.com <-

GC3.12: GAT/! d- s:- !a>? C++(---) UL+ P(+) L++ E W--(++) N o? K w(--)
O V? PS+ PE@ Y PGP- t- 5++ X(+) R+++$ tv+(++) b++@ DI- D+ G+ e h! !r y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998
Message no. 3
From: loneeagle@********.co.uk (Lone Eagle)
Subject: Email bounces
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 20:47:55 +0000
At 08:57 AM 29/10/2002 +1100, James wrote:
>Hi guys - I finally managed to get myself back on the list from a stable
>email. I'm guessing I missed something in the intervening week or so though.
>Can anyone tell my why I'm getting emails back from
>shadowrn-bounce@*****.dumpshock.com with "unprocessed",
"discarded" and
>"ignored" sections in them? I'm guessing that emails are being vetted, and
>that the only ones let through are those which either contain a single
>message, or a single quote block followed by a response - is that right?
>Is there anything else I need to watch out for being bounced?

Why you're getting all of these "ignored"...etc messages I can't tell you
but I can tell you that I have had no such problems with multi-part mails,
AFAIK there are no restrictions of that sort on the list.



--
Lone Eagle
"Hold up lads, I got an idea."

www.wyrmtalk.co.uk - Please be patient, this site is under construction

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GE d++(---) s++: a->? C++(+) US++ P! L E? W++ N o? K? w+ O! M- V? PS+ PE-()
Y PGP? t+@ 5++ X- R+>+++$>* tv b+++ DI++++ D+ G++ e+ h r* y+>+++++
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----

-----BEGIN SR GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 0.22
SR1+ SR2+ SR3++ h++ b++(+++) B? UB+ !IE(+) RN++>++++ STK+ LST+ NERPS+>+++
W- dk+(+++) sa-- ma- jat++++ m+(-) gm+(++) M-- P(+++)
-----END SR GEEK CODE BLOCK-----

GCC0.2: y75>?.uk[NN] G87 S@:@@[SR] B+++ f+ RM(RR) rm++ rr++ l++(--) m- w
s+(+++) GM+++(-) A GS+(-) h++ LA+++ CG--- F c+

"Can we 'ave your liver then?"
Monty Python's The Meaning of Life

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Email bounces, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.