Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: JOHANNA BURWELL-KALES <burwell@******.EDU>
Subject: Re: E-mail; numbers...
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 1994 20:00:23 -0700
can anybody reprint the fasa e-mail numbers. someone posted them
during the thing about t$r.
Thanx
Message no. 2
From: Damion Milliken <u9467882@******.UOW.EDU.AU>
Subject: Re: E-mail; numbers...
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 1994 13:08:20 +0000
> can anybody reprint the fasa e-mail numbers. someone posted them
> during the thing about t$r.

"It's is the FAQ!"

But anyhow, here they are:

K. FASA Email Addresses
The follow two email addresses have been reported to eventually
end up before the eyes of somebody associated intimately with FASA:

FASA.SUPPORT@*****.GEis.COM
FasaTom@***.COM

--
Damion Milliken University of Wollongong E-Mail: u9467882@******.uow.edu.au

(Geek Code 2.1) GE d@ H s++:-- !g p? !au a18 w+ v C+ U P? !L !3 E? N K- W+ M
!V po@ Y t(+) !5 !j r+(++) G(+) !tv(--) b++ D+ B? e+ u@ h+(*)
f+@ !r n--(----)@ !y+
Message no. 3
From: Loki <jek5313@*******.TAMU.EDU>
Subject: Re: E-mail; numbers...
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 1994 23:26:41 -0500
Damion:
--> K. FASA Email Addresses
--> The follow two email addresses have been reported to eventually
--> end up before the eyes of somebody associated intimately with FASA:
-->
--> FASA.SUPPORT@*****.GEis.COM
--> FasaTom@***.COM

Don't forget FASAMIKE@***.COM, who is the gent responsible for GEnie as
well. And if you call the company, you'll probably end up talking to
him. Nice guy.





--

Dark Thought Publications & Doom Technologies, Inc.
>>> Working on solutions best left in the dark.

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about E-mail; numbers..., you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.