Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: "J. Keith Henry" <Ereskanti@***.COM>
Subject: Examples of the FAQ Breakage (was:Re: Spanking the Cheetah)
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 09:22:53 -0400
In a message dated 97-09-29 20:34:03 EDT, irvine@***.PURDUE.EDU writes:

>
> Who you calling pseudo kitty? I'll have you know missy I'm a Shamanic
Adept
> that follows the path of Cheetah. Combined with the fur, teeth,
> rectractable
> claws, and bio-augmented tail, there's nothing 'pseudo' about me. And if
> you
> doubt my speed... Just ask Prophet. He's seen me move.
>
Here is something that may or may not help everyone involved in this little
fracas. Please note everyone, this is done on purpose.

Barbie, I want a copy of the "Turbo Carp" you mentioned.

Spike, I liked the response that had "NO" subject line.

Cheetah, "Prophet" is an unknown to the people here and that game was good,
but beware of the reasons that people play any role playing game. For as
long and as intensively as I have played, there are ALWAYS reasons beyond the
obvious.

OH, And BTW to the group of those responding to the "Totemic Elementals"
threads, please put the "OT" at the beginning of the postings if you aren't
actually responding to the material I sent out to begin with. Everyone is
jumping Elfman for his not posting his reply with anything from the posting
in it either. I know the rules for the group fairly well, and as I have
seen, everyone here has broken then outright, and on more than one occasion
(Babylon 5 ring too many bells?).

So, in short, the FAQ's be condemned for this one instance of mine. Like all
other rules in the world, they too have been set aside.

Have a good one all.
-Keith (who is Binder, Prophet and so many fragging others-there's you hint)

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Examples of the FAQ Breakage (was:Re: Spanking the Cheetah), you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.