Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Ereskanti@***.com Ereskanti@***.com
Subject: FDA .. Drugs testing
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 14:58:58 EDT
In a message dated 9/15/1999 3:38:09 AM US Eastern Standard Time,
gyro@********.co.za writes:

> I would imagine that the deveoping corp would have to apply for
> permission to sell to Jow Public but that they could foist just about
> any damn thing they like on their "corporate citizens" CP2020 had a
> recurring theme of the megas pumping the streets full of experimental
> drugs tro save on the R&D costs. Anyobe played any games of this
> nature? Oh, and Wordman, did you convert the sections of drugs from
> CP? or was that a Plastic Warriors effort?

I do recall the Z-IC connection in the London Sourcebook to doing something
just like this. A "Milk Scare" for lack of better terms.

I would imagine that conflicts of different kinds arise from Corporate Drug
Testing vs. Governmental Drug Testing. In some ways, this would be a good
set, and I do mean set, of runner-type operations. In this case, the
information of "passable" drugs would have to be inserted in the appropriate
FDA-related computer banks, allowing for "Drug X; the latest super-vitamin"
to hit the streets. In fact, another run, more Matrix-oriented IMO, would be
to have a decker or group of deckers/operators attempt to find the FDA
"Suprise Check" testing times aquired from a given database. This
information would allow for a corporation to "guarantee" the samples of
"Drug
X" would be passable.

Additionally, now that I think about this, *some* Drug Testing might run into
something a bit more impressive. I can only imagine what the "VITAS Testing
Labs" are like personally, for instance.

-K

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about FDA .. Drugs testing, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.