Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: George Campbell <daishi@*******.EECS.NWU.EDU>
Subject: Filters
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 1993 02:30:30 CST
I'm trying to get the elm filter for this to work and I'm having trouble
getting the right rule. What I want to do is save all messages from the list
to a mailbox called shadowrn. Has anyone gotten this to work with elm-filter?

--

_/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ | Daishi@***.edu
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ | Drubar@******** Realms
_/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/ | Midnight@*********
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ | Midnight@************
_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ | Midnight@****** Realms
"You've got to risk losing, you've got to risk everything..."
- Searching for Bobby Fisher
Message no. 2
From: "Robert A. Hayden" <hayden@*******.MANKATO.MSUS.EDU>
Subject: Re: Filters
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 1993 11:39:49 -0600
On Tue, 9 Nov 1993, George Campbell wrote:

> I'm trying to get the elm filter for this to work and I'm having trouble
> getting the right rule. What I want to do is save all messages from the list
> to a mailbox called shadowrn. Has anyone gotten this to work with elm-filter?

You want to seach by who the message is TO. For shadowRN mail, the to
line reads some thing like:
Multiple recipients of list SHADOWRN

Your filter-rules entry would look like:
if (to "Multiple recipients of list SHADOWRN") ? save
"path/to/folder"

Then, all ShadowRN mail would be sorted into the folder you specify,
while other mail would pass through into your normal inbox.

NOTE: Because it does a regular expression search, yyou must make sure
that you do not shorten the match expression. If you sorted by:
'Multiple recipients of'

Then all lists would match, becuase filter doesn't match exactly, just if
the expression you define is contained in the field you search.

____ Robert A. Hayden <=> hayden@*******.mankato.msus.edu
\ /__ -=-=-=-=- <=> -=-=-=-=-
\/ / Finger for Geek Code Info <=> Veteran of the Bermuda Triangle
\/ Finger for PGP 2.3a Public Key <=> Expeditionary Force -- 1993-1951
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
(GEEK CODE 1.0.1) GAT d- -p+(---) c++(++++) l++ u++ e+/* m++(*)@ s-/++
n-(---) h+(*) f+ g+ w++ t++ r++ y+(*)
Message no. 3
From: The Powerhouse <P.C.Steele@*********.AC.UK>
Subject: Re: Filters
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 1993 17:47:54 GMT
<=> Veteran of the Bermuda Triangle
<=> Expeditionary Force -- 1993-1951

Since when ?

--
Phillip Steele - Email address P.C.Steele@***.ac.uk | An Uzi a day keeps the
Department Of Electrical & Electronic Engineering | politicians at bay O O
University Of Newcastle Upon Tyne, England | |
Land of the mad Geordies | The Powerhouse \_/
Message no. 4
From: "Robert A. Hayden" <hayden@*******.MANKATO.MSUS.EDU>
Subject: Re: Filters
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 1993 11:56:55 -0600
On Tue, 9 Nov 1993, The Powerhouse wrote:

> <=> Veteran of the Bermuda Triangle
> <=> Expeditionary Force -- 1993-1951
>
> Since when ?

Sorry, I'm busy packing. I have to get ready to leave last week.

____ Robert A. Hayden <=> hayden@*******.mankato.msus.edu
\ /__ -=-=-=-=- <=> -=-=-=-=-
\/ / Finger for Geek Code Info <=> Veteran of the Bermuda Triangle
\/ Finger for PGP 2.3a Public Key <=> Expeditionary Force -- 1993-1951
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
(GEEK CODE 1.0.1) GAT d- -p+(---) c++(++++) l++ u++ e+/* m++(*)@ s-/++
n-(---) h+(*) f+ g+ w++ t++ r++ y+(*)
Message no. 5
From: Chris Siebenmann <cks@********.UTCS.TORONTO.EDU>
Subject: Re: Filters
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 1993 15:29:35 -0500
The most reliable filter for Shadowrun mail is (on Unix systems) to key
off what the 'From ' line address ends with; for Shadowrn mail, this is
'.*nic.surfnet.nl!owner-shadowrn' (in regexp notation) right now.
Checking the 'From ' line will avoid problems with people resending
you mail and obscure error cases; From: can be fooled.

Not that this is real relevant to Shadowrun; my apologies. Send private
mail if you want to talk about procmail and/or mail filtering.

- cks

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Filters, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.