Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: "Dark Thought Publications." <JEK5313@*****.TAMU.EDU>
Subject: Flames and damnation.
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1993 09:54:35 -0500
Hah!!! Made you look!!!

Rob, I apologize about that last message, about the totems. I'm afraid you got
me at a bit of a bad time, and I think (I don't remember, but I _think_) I
popped on a junior flame for a sec there. I wasn't meaning to scram you,
specifically. I was just reacting, albeit poorly, to a plethora of
hare-brained ideas recently come upon in these parts. I just thought that,
since I flamed you publicly, I should apologize publicly as well. I may not
agree with everything that goes on here, but that's no excuse not to be polite
about it.


--Flare <NULLSIG COURTESY OF DOOM>

Dark Thought Publications & Doom Technologies, Inc.
>>> Working on solutions best left in the dark.
Message no. 2
From: "Robert A. Hayden" <hayden@*******.MANKATO.MSUS.EDU>
Subject: Re: Flames and damnation.
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1993 12:10:45 -0500
Hmm, I didn't read it as a flame. Perhaps a little nasty, but I'm used to
that. :)

{[> Robert A. Hayden ____ #include <std_disclaimer.h> <]}
{[> \ /__ ------------------------------- <]}
{[> aq650@****.INS.CWRU.Edu \/ / Bigotry is what is incompatible <]}
{[> hayden@*******.mankato.msus.edu \/ with military service. <]}
-=-=-
GEEK CODE v1.0.1: GSS d- -p+(---) c++(++++) l++ u++ e+/* m++(*)@ s-/++
n-(---) h+(*) f+ g+ w++ t++ r++ y+(*)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Random Thought:

Bobby Knight told me this: 'There is nothing that a good defense cannot beat a
better offense.' In other words a good offense wins.
-- Vice President Dan Quayle comparing the
offensive capabilities of the Warsaw Pact with the
defensive system of NATO
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Flames and damnation., you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.