Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: David Buehrer <dbuehrer@****.ORG>
Subject: Re: [Flame] The Spoiler-Whine
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 12:34:14 -0600
Flame Spoiler. If you don't want to get involved in this, delete this
now.

f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f

Okay, it's not really flame, but I thought I'd give people a chance to
delete this.

TopCat wrote:
|
| Okay, here's the deal...
|
| For those of you that consistently freak out every time someone mentions
| something about any SR product without putting a spoiler buffer in the
| message...
|
| LIGHTEN UP, SPOILER NAZIS!
|
[snip]
|
| So much for me being a "kinder, gentler listmember" eh?

Announcer: Ladies and gentlemen, Topcat has entered the building.

Butthead: No he hasn't. Hehhehhehe. He's in the toilet. Hehehehehe.

:)

Oh man. Topcat, using the word Nazi, in any context, on an
international list, is not a good thing. IMHO, you owe Thomas,
and the list, an apology.

-David
http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/1068/homepage.htm
Message no. 2
From: "J. Keith Henry" <Ereskanti@***.COM>
Subject: Re: [Flame] The Spoiler-Whine
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 1997 01:30:24 -0400
In a message dated 97-06-24 21:43:05 EDT, dbuehrer@****.ORG (David Buehrer)
writes:

<< Oh man. Topcat, using the word Nazi, in any context, on an
international list, is not a good thing. IMHO, you owe Thomas,
and the list, an apology.

-David
http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/1068/homepage.htm >>


Okay...I might have to agree here...the Nazi thing is old before it
started...go find my article on the newsgroups where I got sick of the "US
Bashing", it will give you a hint at some really good ways to lighten up and
face the world better.


Nazi is NOT a bad word...It is a Sad One..

-Keith

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about [Flame] The Spoiler-Whine, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!