Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Gurth <gurth@******.NL>
Subject: Full-cyber decking
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 1995 09:22:45 +0200
Well, I've spent last night looking through VR, and I'll be damned if I can
find anything that explains the pros and cons of full-cybernetic decking.
The only thing I found was that it gives +1D6 initiative (but not +2
Reaction), and that it is explained fully elsewhere -- in another book, if
you ask me. Anyone have more luck?


Gurth@******.nl - Gurth@***.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
I used to think that today would never come
Geek Code v2.1: GS/AT/! -d+ H s:- !g p?(3) !au a>? w+(+++) v*(---) C+(++) U
P? !L !3 E? N++ K- W+ -po+(po) Y+ t(+) 5 !j R+(++)>+++$ tv+(++) b+@ D+(++)
B? e+ u+@ h! f--(?) !r(--)(*) n---->!n y? Unofficial Shadowrun Guru :)
Message no. 2
From: Jani Fikouras <feanor@**********.UNI-BREMEN.DE>
Subject: Re: Full-cyber decking
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 1995 14:45:47 +0200
> Well, I've spent last night looking through VR, and I'll be damned if I can
> find anything that explains the pros and cons of full-cybernetic decking.
> The only thing I found was that it gives +1D6 initiative (but not +2
> Reaction), and that it is explained fully elsewhere -- in another book, if
> you ask me. Anyone have more luck?

Thats all, aint it enough ?

--
"Believe in Angels." -- The Crow

GCS d H s+: !g p1 !au a- w+ v-(?) C++++ UA++S++L+$>++++ L+>+++ E--- N+ W(+)(---)
M-- !V(--) -po+(---) Y+ t++ 5++ R+++ tv b++ e+ u++(-) h*(+) f+ r- n!(-) y?
Message no. 3
From: U-Gene <C14101@*******.BITNET>
Subject: Re: Full-cyber decking
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 1995 11:40:03 EDT
Gurth wrote:
>couldn't find anything that explains the pros and cons of full-cybernetic
>decking. The only thing I found was that it gives +1D6 initiative (But not
>+2 Reaction), and that is explained fully elsewhere -- in another book if you
>ask me. Anyone have more luck?

Well, I don't have any books with me. But I do remember that was about it.
Oh, and the con was that when you tried to jack out, you had a higher target
number to resist dump shock. I look up and post the page tommarrow. I think
its in the VR book.

<< U-Gene -- Decker subjected to much dump shock. Ughhh. >>

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Full-cyber decking, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!