Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: "Jason Carter, Nightstalker" <CARTER@***.EDU>
Subject: Full Cyberinterface
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1993 16:11:00 -0700
>>I was under the impression that regular decks still used keyboards.
>>This is an option for regular decks. When did the full cybernetic
>>link come out? Except the C^2 decks.

First of all, I don't think Full cyber-interface is ever mentioned in conjuction
with C^2 decks. That's just an assumtion made once since they have no keyboard.

As for were they are mentioned as an option for all deckers SRII page 178,
Matrix Initiative.

See Ya in Shadows,
Jason J Carter
The Nightstalker
Message no. 2
From: Todd Montgomery <tmont@****.WVU.EDU>
Subject: Full Cyberinterface
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1993 19:17:06 -0400
> From: "Jason Carter, Nightstalker" <CARTER@***.EDU>
>
> >>I was under the impression that regular decks still used keyboards.
> >>This is an option for regular decks. When did the full cybernetic
> >>link come out? Except the C^2 decks.
>
> First of all, I don't think Full cyber-interface is ever mentioned in
conjuction
> with C^2 decks. That's just an assumtion made once since they have no
keyboard.
>
> As for were they are mentioned as an option for all deckers SRII page 178,
> Matrix Initiative.
>

Ya. With that there is a really easy way to get an additional 1D6
without any penalty (except +2 to resist simsense overload). Then
decks aren't built with keyboards anymore? I just thought that IF you
had a full cybernetic interface then you had the benefits. I didn't think
having one was a choice kind of thing on a normal deck. Oh well, different
interpretations.

-- Quiktek
Todd Montgomery

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Full Cyberinterface, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!