Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: David Buehrer <dbuehrer@******.CARL.ORG>
Subject: Re: Gamemaster boyfriends
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1998 20:57:20 -0600
While doing the Fandango, Dhl9@***.COM wrote:
/
/ In a message dated 9/28/98 12:02:43 PM AST, kama@*******.NET writes:
/
/ > Not to ruin the misogynistic fun . . . however, it is the behavior, not
/ > the gender that causes the annoyance.
/
/ Absolutely. It just so happens that most of us have dealt with the problem
/ with the ladies. I would imagine a guy could be even more irritating.

Don't get me started. Suffice to say that "irritating" is an
understatement.

-David
--
"Earn what you have been given."
--
email: dbuehrer@******.carl.org
http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/1068/homepage.htm
Message no. 2
From: David Buehrer <dbuehrer@******.CARL.ORG>
Subject: Re: Gamemaster boyfriends
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1998 06:55:22 -0600
At 01:22 PM 9/29/98 +1000, you wrote:
>David Buehrer writes:
>> / > Not to ruin the misogynistic fun . . . however, it is the
>> behavior, not
>> / > the gender that causes the annoyance.
>> /
>> / Absolutely. It just so happens that most of us have dealt with
>> the problem
>> / with the ladies. I would imagine a guy could be even more irritating.
>>
>> Don't get me started. Suffice to say that "irritating" is an
>> understatement.
>
>Why, David... I didn't think you were that way inclined...

...nonononono. Not that there's anything wrong with that :) I was
refering to an experience in which the boyfriend of a *female* player made
life a living hell for the rest of our group.

-David

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Gamemaster boyfriends, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!