Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Adam Getchell <acgetchell@*******.EDU>
Subject: Re: Game philosophy (was Street Skills/Attributes)
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1998 11:50:24 -0700
>On 18 Aug 98, at 11:11, Adam Getchell wrote:
>Well, I'd say that Dr. Min is one of those rare, gifted, and talented
>individuals that is able to acheive a higher skill. From your
>description, I would rate him as an 8 or 9.

More like 15 ... ;-)

>Of course, here you go trying to use a real life example to prove the
>worth of rules in a game. Shadowrun does not emulate real life. If it
>did, I wouldn't play it. Instead, it is a system of rules that allow
>players to roleplay and chart the cinematic results of their actions.

A difference of philosophy, Horatio. I generally go with the meta-principle
that games try to reflect reality to some greater or lesser degree. I opt
for a fair amount of reality, especially in a game with magic, to aid in
willing suspension of disbelief and to provide that much the greater
contrast with the seemingly impossible. I think Sommers arguments about
Olympic-level athletes having 10-12 are dead on.

That's why I'd think Dr. Min would rate about a 15. He can easily handle
Olympic-level Taekwondoja or Judoka ... and he's not a physad. His
attributes aren't what they once were, but the skill ... better make it
about 20.

>As you stated earlier, let's agree to disagree. I don't think we are
>gaining any ground here.

"There's more under heaven and earth than dreamt of in your philosophy ..."

> - Tim Kerby - drekhead@***.net - ICQ-UIN 2883757 -

--Adam

acgetchell@*******.edu
"Invincibility is in oneself, vulnerability in the opponent." --Sun Tzu

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Game philosophy (was Street Skills/Attributes), you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.