Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Dust <rogan@*******.BERGEN.ORG>
Subject: Gecko Shamans
Date: Wed, 21 May 1997 13:10:24 -0400
My PC likes the advantages Gecko shamans get (+2 illusion and
manipulation) but we don't know what its personality is. {spotted it in
the totem list in Awakenings} Can't find Paradise Lost so can anyone
enlighten me?

Dust
Message no. 2
From: tom Cone <Brother-1@*****.NET>
Subject: Re: Gecko Shamans
Date: Wed, 21 May 1997 10:31:57 -1000
>Don't know what it's personality is like...
I don't know what it says in 'Paradise Lost', but it would seem to me,
living in the Sunshine...no that's not right...Aloha State, that it
would be a kinda home protector. It barks, keeps the bugs out,
definitely a man-friendly little critter.

Brother-1. Decker for hire.
"Black IC!! You eeediot!! You bloated code!!
You sick little program!! I will DELETE YOU!!!!"
Message no. 3
From: Ray & Tamara <macey@*******.COM.AU>
Subject: Re: Gecko Shamans
Date: Thu, 22 May 1997 09:49:22 +1000
> My PC likes the advantages Gecko shamans get (+2 illusion and
> manipulation) but we don't know what its personality is. {spotted it in
> the totem list in Awakenings} Can't find Paradise Lost so can anyone
> enlighten me?

According to Awakenings, he is fast moving and hard to pin down, but is not
a thief. He always gets into places that others don't wish him to be, and
is very adaptable. He has no favoured environment. The also have the
penalty of a short attention span. The like to get into trouble just for
the fun of getting out of it. They suffer -1 dice for combat spells.

Ray.

-----------------------------------------------------
| The universe is a big place, and whatever happens,|
| You will not be missed |
-----------------------------------------------------

EMAIL: macey@*******.com.au

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Gecko Shamans, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!