From: | Mongoose <evamarie@**********.NET> |
---|---|
Subject: | General bioware rules; why so confusing? |
Date: | Fri, 21 Aug 1998 10:48:33 -0700 |
>pages
>>in the front of Shadowtech giving rules for bioware; read them.
>>
>>Mongoose
>
>Please people come on, let's be nice. I saw Blix post earlier on this
>thread saying correctly that mages (mages = magically active) DID lose
>Essence. She (Boy, I hop I go tthat right! :) just probably got confused
>or something. It happens to alot of (It sure happens to me!), so ley's
>give Blix a break okay?
I'm sorry, Blix. The comment was NOT aimed solely at you, nor intended as
a personal attack; Its just that this single topic (general Bioware rules) has
generated MORE erroneous posts than any other I can recall, and the rules are
printed quite plainly, and in a easily located section of the book. If people
checked it carefully and quoted references when posting on this topic (instead
of appending IIRC, which everybody seems to do, on this one topic), there
wouldn't be 2 erroneous posts to every good one in threads related to Bioware,
which has often been the case in the past. This may partly be due to the
books low availability, but hey, if you don't have it, you probably should not
use rules form it! Its unfortunate Wordman is no longer updating the SR2
shadowFAQ, because some more answers on Bioware probably should have gone in
long ago.
I personally think the Shadowtech Bioware rules are well written (if not
balanced). It boggles my mind the convoluted misreading people invent; I've
seen players in my group deduct BI from body (interesting- shows how good most
Bioware is), or from essence (even though mundane). Everybody seems to think
you can't get more than you have body (you can- it adds to all body tests,
though); this basically was Blix's mistake. Quite a few people also miss the
concept of bio-system overstress (the limit on boosts to any particular
attribute)- its an important one.
Mongoose