Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Anders Swenson <anders@**********.COM>
Subject: German Vehicles
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 14:49:47 -0800
Hello, now you have me piqued. Why dosesn't some list member with the
German language Germany sourcebook just do a RBB2 version of those
little cars, and put it up where we can all see what you are talking
about! --Anders
Message no. 2
From: Gurth <gurth@******.NL>
Subject: Re: German Vehicles
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 12:34:05 +0100
According to Anders Swenson, at 14:49 on 24 Jan 99, the word on
the street was...

> Hello, now you have me piqued. Why dosesn't some list member with the
> German language Germany sourcebook just do a RBB2 version of those
> little cars, and put it up where we can all see what you are talking
> about!

12 cars
5 motorcycles
3 hovercraft
4 boats
4 aircraft
5 helicopters
3 airships
9 military vehicles

That's 45 vehicles. Sure it's possible, but it'd take time because if you
haven't discovered it yet, translating a vehicle to R2 rules isn't the
most interesting job in the world :)

BTW, if you want to look at the stats for these vehicles, just download
NAGEE #5 or #6.

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
And that's as far as the conversation went.
-> NERPS Project Leader * ShadowRN GridSec * Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
->The Plastic Warriors Page: http://shadowrun.html.com/plasticwarriors/<-
-> The New Character Mortuary: http://www.electricferret.com/mortuary/ <-

GC3.1: GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+
PE Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998
Message no. 3
From: ArcLight <arclight@**************.COM>
Subject: AW: German Vehicles
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 13:18:13 +0100
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Shadowrun Discussion [mailto:SHADOWRN@********.ITRIBE.NET]Im
> Auftrag von Anders Swenson
> Gesendet am: Sonntag, 24. Januar 1999 2350
> An: SHADOWRN@********.ITRIBE.NET
> Betreff: German Vehicles
>
> Hello, now you have me piqued. Why dosesn't some list member with the
> German language Germany sourcebook just do a RBB2 version of those
> little cars, and put it up where we can all see what you are talking
> about! --Anders

I am currently trying to get a friend of mine into sending me
the stats from his R2d; then I would check them (they're converted
by Fanpro <g>) and either post them and/ or mail them to the people
who asked 4 it.

ArcLight
ICQ 14322211
NO ONE IS SAFE FROM A MICROWAVE
Message no. 4
From: Peter Mikulsky <petermikulsky@***.COM>
Subject: Re: AW: German Vehicles
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 16:43:16 +0100
ArcLight wrote:

>I am currently trying to get a friend of mine into sending me
>the stats from his R2d; then I would check them (they're converted
>by Fanpro <g>) and either post them and/ or mail them to the people
>who asked 4 it.


I had made a short look at the FanPro-Hompage, but the didm't mentioned a
new RIgger book, heck the didn't mentioned the english versions anyway.

Is your friend a playtester??

-Archangel
Message no. 5
From: ArcLight <arclight@**************.COM>
Subject: AW: AW: German Vehicles
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 18:34:57 +0100
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Shadowrun Discussion [mailto:SHADOWRN@********.ITRIBE.NET]Im
> Auftrag von Peter Mikulsky
> Gesendet am: Montag, 25. Januar 1999 1643
> An: SHADOWRN@********.ITRIBE.NET
> Betreff: Re: AW: German Vehicles
>

<snip>

> I had made a short look at the FanPro-Hompage, but the didm't mentioned a
> new RIgger book, heck the didn't mentioned the english versions anyway.

Hmh, you're not the first who tells me R2d is not being sold yet...
IIRC, a friend of mine owns one, but now I am reeeaaally unsure about
this. I'll check it.

ArcLight
ICQ 14322211
NO ONE IS SAFE FROM A MICROWAVE

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about German Vehicles, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.