Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: "Bill P. Flint" <claymore@******.DIGEX.NET>
Subject: Great Spirits...
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 1994 02:33:05 -0500
I was wondering how many Great Spirits can one conjurer have under his control?
Is it equal to the conjurer's charisma? 1/2 charisma?

Does the number the number of Great Spirits count with the number of normal
spirits a conjurer can have?

I need to know before one of my mages decides to conjure one up and decides he
wants another one.

--Bill Flint
Message no. 2
From: Matt <mosbun@******.CC.PURDUE.EDU>
Subject: Re: Great Spirits...
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 1994 09:35:42 -0500
Far as I know, Great Spirits count against the magician's charisma the same
as regular spirits do.

Matt
Message no. 3
From: "Jason Carter, Nightstalker" <CARTER@***.EDU>
Subject: Re: Great Spirits...
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 1994 11:44:54 -0800
Bill Flint asked:

>>I was wondering how many Great Spirits can one conjurer have under his
>>control? Is it equal to the conjurer's charisma? 1/2 charisma?

>>Does the number the number of Great Spirits count with the number of normal
>>spirits a conjurer can have?

Great Spirits are included in the count with normal spirits that a magician
can control. Thus a shaman can have one spirit (lesser or greater) in any
domain, while a mage can control a total of Charisma spirits with any mix of
greater or lesser forms.

*******************************************************************************
* See Ya in Shadows * * "Keep your friends close, but keep *
* Jason J Carter * Carter@***.EDU * your enemies closer." *
* The Nightstalker * * Deep Throat -- The X-Files *
*******************************************************************************

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Great Spirits..., you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.