Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Mongoose <evamarie@**********.NET>
Subject: How Big? (Re: Smartgun Links)
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 15:40:56 -0700
:Similarly, the retractable Hand Blade cyberware (from Cybertechnology
:and BBB3) that pops out of the side of the palm, would be too bulky
:IMHO for implantation into a cyberhand with a smartgun induction pad,
:as I stated above. Your Mileage May Vary.
:

How big do you figure that "pad" must be. The cocnep of a thick wedge
of metal in your hand seems pretty outmoded; flexable conductors would
work, and there work toaday on building fractal antenae into CHIPS. I
don't think the link would need to take up much physical space. That
does't improve concealablity much; when shaking hands, you might notice a
person has a WART in thier palm- humans are tuned to notice such things.
It might need a power source, but then so would the hand.

:This means small, simple things like a tracking beacon, could still
:fit in, but larger items like a cellphone, or optical chip based audio
:player, would be too big. (However, if the smartlink pad were left
:out, I think either of those last two would _just_ barely fit)
:

SR has EARPLUG phones; you put those in a fingertip. (Then actually
hold your hand like a "phone"). The bulky part of a OC player would be
the buttons, amp, and speakers; one designed for cyber control and
headware playback could be TINY (the ear recorder includes playback, and
its headware).

:Of course, this is all for the concealable "synthetic" cyberhands. If
:you want to go for the obvious chrome look, then you can cram a lot
:more in, though don't have me go glove shopping for you for the
:hollidays. Either route, if you're going to be cramming more than 2 or
:3 items into one cyberhand, then you'll most likely have to get the
:thing custom made, which means the GM should feel free to add a mark
:up on parts, and charge for the labor too.


Well, there's the catch; how much space does the internals of the hand
require, and can their layout be altered? That would put a big damper on
using multiple non-minturizable systems, and even a cap on electronics,
eventually.
Message no. 2
From: Steve Eley <sfeley@***.NET>
Subject: Re: How Big? (Re: Smartgun Links)
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 17:14:01 -0400
Mongoose wrote:
>
> SR has EARPLUG phones; you put those in a fingertip. (Then actually
> hold your hand like a "phone").

"Why is your finger in your ear?"
"What?"
"I said, why is your finger in your ear?"
"WHAT?"
"HEY! WHY IS YOUR FINGER IN YOUR EAR?"
"NO TIME TO TALK, I'M ON THE PHONE!"


Have Fun,
- Steve Eley
sfeley@***.net
Message no. 3
From: Paul Gettle <RunnerPaul@*****.COM>
Subject: Re: How Big? (Re: Smartgun Links)
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 22:40:29 -0400
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

At 05:14 PM 9/10/98 -0400, Steve wrote:
>Mongoose wrote:
>> SR has EARPLUG phones; you put those in a fingertip. (Then
actually
>> hold your hand like a "phone").
>
>"Why is your finger in your ear?"
>"What?"
>"I said, why is your finger in your ear?"
>"WHAT?"
>"HEY! WHY IS YOUR FINGER IN YOUR EAR?"
>"NO TIME TO TALK, I'M ON THE PHONE!"

Can we say "Social Roll penalty for obvious cyber"?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.5.3

iQCVAwUBNfiNkaPbvUVI86rNAQEQEwQApe+1DyGroIbKeQNApaHQaNaypEcZbAKj
2CTRDalYGIUscUVqTxEHRqqyR8xeG+QUsPLdmYRUumJ40Q1wJr2Dgjf2lKqwLtvI
Vh4Sz+6zA02s6hVS9BXPg/gZLitCbF63CZjlEBumglYoN8Mj38BKuiY21IGiIHwN
WX39chEyHgY=
=v87+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
-- Paul Gettle, #970 of 1000 (RunnerPaul@*****.com)
PGP Fingerprint, Key ID:0x48F3AACD (RSA 1024, created 98/06/26)
C260 94B3 6722 6A25 63F8 0690 9EA2 3344

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about How Big? (Re: Smartgun Links), you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.