Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Damion Milliken <adm82@***.EDU.AU>
Subject: Re: HTH in Close Quarters
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 1995 17:33:48 +1000
Robert Watkins writes:

> [Close Quarters HTH house rule]

Seems good enough. Do you allow for someone wielding a low reach weapon to
"close" on a person with a long reach weapon? ie to get in "under" the
effective reach of the weapon?

--
Damion Milliken Unofficial Shadowrun Guru E-mail: adm82@***.edu.au

(GEEK CODE 2.1) GE -d+@ H s++:-- !g p0 !au a19 w+ v(?) C++ US++>+++ P+ L !3
E? N K- W M@ !V po@ Y+ t+ 5 !j R+(++) G(+)('''') !tv(--@)
b++ D B? e+$ u@ h* f+ !r n----(--)@ !y+
Message no. 2
From: P Ward <P.Ward@**.CF.AC.UK>
Subject: Re: HTH in Close Quarters
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 1995 10:45:20 -0300
Damion asked :-
> Seems good enough. Do you allow for someone wielding a low reach weapon to
> "close" on a person with a long reach weapon? ie to get in
"under" the
> effective reach of the weapon?

The way I work it, is that if you canb land an attack on them even
with their reach, then you're in close, or if you can accept there
hit on you, and not get knoced back/down, AND only take a light
wound in the process.

Phil (renegade)

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about HTH in Close Quarters, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.