Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: shadowrn@*********.com (Valeu John EMFA)
Subject: ICBMs & SBs (was: Re: 10 Rigger 3 gripes & More rigger 3 nitp
Date: Thu Jul 12 00:10:01 2001
At 10:50 11.07.2001 +0200, Gurth wrote:

<snip>

>>Unless you want as much fallout as possible, in which case the fireball
from
>>the explosion needs to touch the ground. (Air bursts are pretty clean in
>>this respect, but ground bursts irradiate the dust they kick up.) I can
see
>>terrorists going for a ground burst...

>Sure :) But terrorists wouldn't hijack a SB to deliver such a weapon. IMO
>they would rather try to smuggle it into the target country by land or sea,

>when possible. Maybe even transport the nuke in parts, and put it together
>at the target site.

[OT]Great... I hope no one I don't know looks at this. I might be sent to
court martial.

[T]Dismantling the nuke is a good idea. For all the electronic and
mechanical parts anyway. Of course the major problem would be getting the
radioactive material into your target area or country. And then there's the
task of putting the thing back together. There aint no Chilton's for a
nuclear bomb. You know, I think Arclight hit the nail on the head here.
Smuggle it in or DITY (Do it yourself).

EMFA John Valeu
-AKA- TimeKeeper

"Information is Power. To give out the correct information at the correct
time is to control the present; to withhold information at the correct time
is to control the future"
--Charles J.C. Lyall

"He who controls the past, commands the future.
He who commands the future, conquers the past."
-- Kane

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about ICBMs & SBs (was: Re: 10 Rigger 3 gripes & More rigger 3 nitp, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.