Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Luke Kendall <luke@********.CANON.OZ.AU>
Subject: Idea - (Was: Re: New list?)
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 1995 09:57:29 +1000
On Tue, 1 Aug 1995, S.F. Eley wrote:

> Oh well. Here's what I'll do.. I think I'll create the new list, on an
> experimental basis, and see if anyone actually bothers to subscribe to it
> and get it moving..

Robert A. Hayden wrote:

> I object.

I don't actually _object_. I'd like to read the stuff that S.F would
have on his list, so I'd probably subscribe if necessary. But for once
I agree with Robert, and can't see a good reason not to post them here.

> And you want to do this for what I see as a poor reason. If you want to
> discuss plots to send your runners on, THIS is the list to do it on (and
> that is defined in its original charter). Another list will just
> factionalize and fractionalize the community we have here.

> And if your reason for not publishing here is so you can "surprise" your
> players, what's to stop them from joinging the other list? Are you going
> to censor it from certain people?

How's this? The postings that are meant to be news items from `real'
news agencies in the SR world could be indicated by making sure they
had a distinctive subject line, like `SEATTLE CYBERNEWS, Wed Feb 4th, 2054'.

Others could be marked with a simple prefix - `PLOT: ...' or `YARN: ...'
or something.

If people were prepared to invest the effort of choosing and sticking
to a small set of subject line markers, then you'd get the best of
both worlds, I believe.

luke

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Idea - (Was: Re: New list?), you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.