Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: mattness@**.pl (MATT)
Subject: I discovered IE conspiracy!
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:34:49 +0200
I was looking for Shadowrun Running Wild authors...

I found something like this (check the Art Direction):
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0048571/fullcredits

Rob, you don't have to hid anymore.
You can post in sperethiel ;P

Cheers

MATT
http://shadowrun.rpg.pl
Message no. 2
From: jon.gilmour@*****.com (Jon Gilmour)
Subject: I discovered IE conspiracy!
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 10:27:43 -0400
huh?!

On 9/24/06, MATT <mattness@**.pl> wrote:
>
> I was looking for Shadowrun Running Wild authors...
>
> I found something like this (check the Art Direction):
> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0048571/fullcredits
>
> Rob, you don't have to hid anymore.
> You can post in sperethiel ;P
>
> Cheers
>
> MATT
> http://shadowrun.rpg.pl
>
Message no. 3
From: bulletraven@***********.com (Peter Mellett)
Subject: I discovered IE conspiracy!
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:33:03 +0100
Jon Gilmour wrote:
> huh?!
>
> On 9/24/06, MATT <mattness@**.pl> wrote:
>>
>> I was looking for Shadowrun Running Wild authors...
>>
>> I found something like this (check the Art Direction):
>> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0048571/fullcredits
>>
>> Rob, you don't have to hid anymore.
>> You can post in sperethiel ;P
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> MATT
>> http://shadowrun.rpg.pl
>>
>
That was my sentiment exactly... could you further elaborate on your
post please Matt?
Message no. 4
From: grossfuerst@***.de (Lars)
Subject: I discovered IE conspiracy!
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:32:54 +0200
i guess he means the entry for:


Robert F. Boyle
Date of birth (location)
10 October 1909
Los Angeles, California, USA

Lars

----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Mellett" <bulletraven@***********.com>
To: "Shadowrun Discussion" <shadowrn@*****.dumpshock.com>
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 4:33 PM
Subject: Re: I discovered IE conspiracy!


> Jon Gilmour wrote:
> > huh?!
> >
> > On 9/24/06, MATT <mattness@**.pl> wrote:
> >>
> >> I was looking for Shadowrun Running Wild authors...
> >>
> >> I found something like this (check the Art Direction):
> >> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0048571/fullcredits
> >>
> >> Rob, you don't have to hid anymore.
> >> You can post in sperethiel ;P
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >>
> >> MATT
> >> http://shadowrun.rpg.pl
> >>
> >
> That was my sentiment exactly... could you further elaborate on your
> post please Matt?
>
Message no. 5
From: chris@*******.com (Chris Maxfield)
Subject: I discovered IE conspiracy!
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:38:51 +1000
Peter Mellett advised:
>Jon Gilmour wrote:
>> huh?!
>>
>> On 9/24/06, MATT <mattness@**.pl> wrote:
>>>
>>> I was looking for Shadowrun Running Wild authors...
>>>
>>> I found something like this (check the Art Direction):
>>> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0048571/fullcredits
>>>
>>> Rob, you don't have to hid anymore.
>>> You can post in sperethiel ;P
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> MATT
>>> http://shadowrun.rpg.pl
>>>
>>
>That was my sentiment exactly... could you further elaborate on your
>post please Matt?



What does the name "Rob Boyle" have in common between that old movie
and Shadowrun. :-)

Chris
Message no. 6
From: corsair0@***.com (corsair0@***.com)
Subject: I discovered IE conspiracy!
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:32:48 -0400
-----Original Message-----
From: grossfuerst@***.de
To: shadowrn@*****.dumpshock.com
Sent: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 7:32 AM
Subject: Re: I discovered IE conspiracy!

i guess he means the entry for:


Robert F. Boyle
Date of birth (location)
10 October 1909
Los Angeles, California, USA

Lars

----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Mellett" <bulletraven@***********.com>
To: "Shadowrun Discussion" <shadowrn@*****.dumpshock.com>
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 4:33 PM
Subject: Re: I discovered IE conspiracy!


> Jon Gilmour wrote:
> > huh?!
> >
> > On 9/24/06, MATT <mattness@**.pl> wrote:
> >>
> >> I was looking for Shadowrun Running Wild authors...
> >>
> >> I found something like this (check the Art Direction):
> >> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0048571/fullcredits
> >>
> >> Rob, you don't have to hid anymore.
> >> You can post in sperethiel ;P
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >>
> >> MATT
> >> http://shadowrun.rpg.pl
> >>
> >
> That was my sentiment exactly... could you further elaborate on your
> post please Matt?
>



Matt has obviously unearthed evidence that Rob Boyle, Line Developer

under FanPro for Shadowrun and Art Director for the Shadowrun 4th ed

book, is himself an immortal elf!



Was he involved in the Harlequin story arc I wonder?

From SR 4th edition:
Shadowrun Line Developer
Rob Boyle
Art Direction
Rob Boyle
________________________________________________________________________
Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB of storage and industry-leading spam and email
virus protection.
Message no. 7
From: bulletraven@***********.com (Peter Mellett)
Subject: I discovered IE conspiracy!
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:12:18 +0100
corsair0@***.com wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: grossfuerst@***.de
> To: shadowrn@*****.dumpshock.com
> Sent: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 7:32 AM
> Subject: Re: I discovered IE conspiracy!
>
> i guess he means the entry for:
>
>
> Robert F. Boyle
> Date of birth (location)
> 10 October 1909
> Los Angeles, California, USA
>
> Lars
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Peter Mellett" <bulletraven@***********.com>
> To: "Shadowrun Discussion" <shadowrn@*****.dumpshock.com>
> Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 4:33 PM
> Subject: Re: I discovered IE conspiracy!
>
>
>
>> Jon Gilmour wrote:
>>
>>> huh?!
>>>
>>> On 9/24/06, MATT <mattness@**.pl> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I was looking for Shadowrun Running Wild authors...
>>>>
>>>> I found something like this (check the Art Direction):
>>>> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0048571/fullcredits
>>>>
>>>> Rob, you don't have to hid anymore.
>>>> You can post in sperethiel ;P
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>>
>>>> MATT
>>>> http://shadowrun.rpg.pl
>>>>
>>>>
>> That was my sentiment exactly... could you further elaborate on your
>> post please Matt?
>>
>>
>
>
>
> Matt has obviously unearthed evidence that Rob Boyle, Line Developer
>
> under FanPro for Shadowrun and Art Director for the Shadowrun 4th ed
>
> book, is himself an immortal elf!
>
>
>
> Was he involved in the Harlequin story arc I wonder?
>
> From SR 4th edition:
> Shadowrun Line Developer
> Rob Boyle
> Art Direction
> Rob Boyle
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB of storage and industry-leading spam and
email virus protection.
>
>
Ahhhhhh!

Thanks for clearing that up :) I was very, very confused.

Cheers,
Pete
Message no. 8
From: anders@**********.com (Anders Swenson)
Subject: I discovered IE conspiracy!
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 08:17:12 -0700
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:12:18 +0100
Peter Mellett <bulletraven@***********.com> wrote:
> corsair0@***.com wrote:
[snip]
> > Was he involved in the Harlequin story arc I wonder?
> >
> > From SR 4th edition:
> > Shadowrun Line Developer
> > Rob Boyle
> > Art Direction
> > Rob Boyle
>
In addition to bottom psting, it's usual practise to clean up the message and
snip out blank and old lines.
--Anders
Message no. 9
From: bulletraven@***********.com (Peter Mellett)
Subject: I discovered IE conspiracy!
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:20:16 +0100
Anders Swenson wrote:
> In addition to bottom psting, it's usual practise to clean up the message and
> snip out blank and old lines.
> --Anders
>
>
Sorry :(

I thought this thread was about Internet Explorer when I first saw it ;)

Pete
Message no. 10
From: anders@**********.com (Anders Swenson)
Subject: I discovered IE conspiracy!
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 08:29:41 -0700
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:20:16 +0100
Peter Mellett <bulletraven@***********.com> wrote:
> Anders Swenson wrote:
> > In addition to bottom psting, it's usual practise to clean up the message
> and
> > snip out blank and old lines.
> > --Anders
> >
> >
> Sorry :(
>
> I thought this thread was about Internet Explorer when I first saw it ;)
>
> Pete

What part of the discussion might be incompatible with that? There's still
the possibility of conspiracy. Noone has proved that Gates isn't another IE,
afer all! The Canon is strangely silent about his fate, he might be any of
the IEs mentioned in Secrets of Power, after all. And he goes on, strewing
possible list topics...

--Anders
Message no. 11
From: sfeley@*****.com (Stephen Eley)
Subject: I discovered IE conspiracy!
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:26:03 -0400
On 9/26/06, Peter Mellett <bulletraven@***********.com> wrote:
>
> I thought this thread was about Internet Explorer when I first saw it ;)

I almost deleted it as spam. It is a very random-looking subject line.

--
Have Fun,
Steve Eley (sfeley@*****.com)
ESCAPE POD - The Science Fiction Podcast Magazine
http://www.escapepod.org
Message no. 12
From: gurth@******.nl (Gurth)
Subject: I discovered IE conspiracy!
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:57:29 +0200
According to Anders Swenson, on 26-9-06 17:29 the word on the street was...

> What part of the discussion might be incompatible with that? There's still
> the possibility of conspiracy. Noone has proved that Gates isn't another IE,
> afer all! The Canon is strangely silent about his fate, he might be any of
> the IEs mentioned in Secrets of Power, after all.

Who do you think Brian Gates III is ... ?

--
Gurth@******.nl - Stone Age: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
"Executives can use it without reading manuals, which is sort
of our test of ease-of-use." --Steve Jobs
-> Former NAGEE Editor & ShadowRN GridSec * Triangle Virtuoso <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Site: http://plastic.dumpshock.com <-

GC3.12: GAT/! d- s:- !a>? C++(---) UB+ P(+) L++ E W++(--) N o? K w-- O
M+ PS+ PE@ Y PGP- t- 5++ X(+) R+++$ tv+(++) b++@ DI- D G+ e h! !r y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998
Message no. 13
From: mattness@**.pl (MATT)
Subject: I discovered IE conspiracy!
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:26:48 +0200
I'm sorry for confusing previous post.
Poor English, my fault.

Thanks to Chris Maxfield & Peter Meller for explanation.

>> I thought this thread was about Internet Explorer when I first >>saw it ;)
>>
>> Pete

>What part of the discussion might be incompatible with that? >There's still
>the possibility of conspiracy. Noone has proved that Gates isn't >another IE,
>afer all! The Canon is strangely silent about his fate
>(snip)
>--Anders

You don't remember Gates family and Microdeck, don't you? ;)

MATT
http://shadowrun.rpg.pl
Message no. 14
From: mattness@**.pl (MATT)
Subject: I discovered IE conspiracy!
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:26:48 +0200
I'm sorry for confusing previous post.
Poor English, my fault.

Thanks to Chris Maxfield & Peter Meller for explanation.

>> I thought this thread was about Internet Explorer when I first >>saw it ;)
>>
>> Pete

>What part of the discussion might be incompatible with that? >There's still
>the possibility of conspiracy. Noone has proved that Gates isn't >another IE,
>afer all! The Canon is strangely silent about his fate
>(snip)
>--Anders

You don't remember Gates family and Microdeck, don't you? ;)

MATT
http://shadowrun.rpg.pl
Message no. 15
From: anders@**********.com (Anders Swenson)
Subject: I discovered IE conspiracy!
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:10:45 -0700
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:26:48 +0200
MATT <mattness@**.pl> wrote:
> I'm sorry for confusing previous post.
> Poor English, my fault.
>
> Thanks to Chris Maxfield & Peter Meller for explanation.
>
> >> I thought this thread was about Internet Explorer when I first >>saw
it
> ;)
> >>
> >> Pete
>
> >What part of the discussion might be incompatible with that? There's still
> >the possibility of conspiracy. Noone has proved that Gates isn't >another
> IE, afTer all! The Canon is strangely silent about his fate(snip)
> >--Anders
>
> You don't remember Gates family and Microdeck, don't you? ;)
>
> MATT
> http://shadowrun.rpg.pl

Of course, but the topic was handled so cavalierly that one just assumes
obfuscation and cosnpiracy. ANd they never talked about Bill in all that.
Besides, doesn't he look like an elf?

--Anders

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about I discovered IE conspiracy!, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.