Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: GKoth2258@***.com
Subject: In-character
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 1996 20:02:40 -0500
Our group was always more of a shoot-em-up roll-playing type of group, but we
did do something to ensure a minimum level of role-playing, regardless of the
people involved.

Anything said, unless otherwise noted, was assumed to be in character.
Certain individuals got their PCs scragged a few times when the player
insulted the Johnson (or other NPC) without saying that it was
"out-of-character." We all wised up real fast, even those sam types...

Erik
Message no. 2
From: Mike Loseke <mike@***.sc.colostate.edu>
Subject: Re: In-character
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 1996 10:55:31 -0700
GKoth2258@***.com wrote:
>
> Our group was always more of a shoot-em-up roll-playing type of group, but we
> did do something to ensure a minimum level of role-playing, regardless of the
> people involved.
>
> Anything said, unless otherwise noted, was assumed to be in character.
> Certain individuals got their PCs scragged a few times when the player
> insulted the Johnson (or other NPC) without saying that it was
> "out-of-character." We all wised up real fast, even those sam types...

This is what we call "Paranoia Rules": whatever anyone says or does, their
character says and does. We used to play Paranoia like that (and I don't
recall whether or not it was a hard and fast printed rule. We tend to use
it when everyone and everything gets out of hand. It has a real nice way
of bringing things back to sanity (as close as we'll ever get anyway...).

--
Mike Loseke - Ft Collins, CO | Administrator's Dictionary --
mike@***.sc.colostate.edu | user (loo'zer) n. 1 A waste of system resources;
SysAdm, Lory SC, CSU | an unwanted load on the processor(s) of a Unix
http://www.sc.colostate.edu | system. 2 Someone who uses Caps Lock.

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about In-character, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.