Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: shadowrn@*********.com (Graht)
Subject: Intelligence and Education
Date: Thu May 10 10:05:01 2001
At 10:53 AM 5/10/2001 +0200, Gurth wrote:
>According to Graht, on Wed, 09 May 2001 the word on the street was...
>
> > An intelligent character can represent a poor education by spending those
> > free knowledge points on knowledge skills that one would learn outside the
> > education system, say gang sign, area knowledge of their home
> street/block,
> > trivid shows from 2045 to 2055, etc. By virtue of having a high
> > intelligence they are more perceptive and aware of their surroundings and
> > will file that information away, but high intelligence doesn't have to
> mean
> > well educated.
>
>I don't agree. This is saying that education is only what you learn in
>school, or some other formal setting, and though that may be true if you
>look at the meaning of the word, IMHO "well-educated" in a game system
>doesn't necessarily mean having gone to school (and paid attention :)
>Rather, I see it as meaning that you have a wide, firm knowledge base,
>regardless of how you got it. In SR, this is inevitably linked to your
>Intelligence -- with a low Intelligence, you'll never be well-educated in
>this sense.

Well, yes, if you put it that way your are correct :) When I hear educated
I think school taught, but it could just as easily apply to life taught.

Given that, how would you justify the Uneducated flaw with someone who is
intelligent? Maybe they were brought up in sterile environment where they
were not school educated and just about every need was taken care of. Or
maybe they are a stubborn person who refuses to learn from mistakes.

To Life,
-Graht
ShadowRN Gridsec, Nice Guy Division
--
Message no. 2
From: shadowrn@*********.com (stefan)
Subject: Intelligence and Education
Date: Thu May 10 11:35:01 2001
>Well, yes, if you put it that way your are correct :) When I hear
>educated I think school taught, but it could just as easily apply to life
>taught.
>
>Given that, how would you justify the Uneducated flaw with someone who is
>intelligent? Maybe they were brought up in sterile environment where they
>were not school educated and just about every need was taken care of. Or
>maybe they are a stubborn person who refuses to learn from mistakes.

Intelligence does not equal good or high Education (Prime example being the
current US president, dumb as a something really dump but he has a degree
from a top notch university).

/s
Message no. 3
From: shadowrn@*********.com (Gurth)
Subject: Intelligence and Education
Date: Thu May 10 14:30:01 2001
According to Graht, on Thu, 10 May 2001 the word on the street was...

> Well, yes, if you put it that way your are correct :) When I hear educated
> I think school taught, but it could just as easily apply to life taught.
>
> Given that, how would you justify the Uneducated flaw with someone who is
> intelligent? Maybe they were brought up in sterile environment where they
> were not school educated and just about every need was taken care of. Or
> maybe they are a stubborn person who refuses to learn from mistakes.

Something like that, yes. Very perceptive (intelligent?) but never exposed
to, or interested in, learning things. "As long as I can get by with what I
know, why would I want to learn anything new?" perhaps.

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
If there are vegetarian hamburgers, why isn't there beef lettuce?
-> NAGEE Editor * ShadowRN GridSec * Triangle Virtuoso <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://plastic.dumpshock.com <-

GC3.12: GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+@ UL P L++ E W-(++) N o? K w+(--) O V?
PS+ PE(-)(+) Y PGP- t@ 5++ X(+) R+++(-)>$ tv+ b++@ DI- D+ G+ e h! !r y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Intelligence and Education, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.