Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: shadowrn@*********.com (shadowrn@*********.com)
Subject: Intro message
Date: Thu Jun 28 10:55:01 2001
A couple weeks ago, during the Valeu John EFMA "dragon-PC" discussion,
someone (I thought it was VJ, but I couldn't find the message) sent out an
introductory letters to his players and CC'd the list.

I was planning on doing something similar, and while I'm definitely making
some changes, I wanted to plagarize some of it... unfortunately, I can't
find the email message. I think I saved it someone so I would have access
to it when the time came and now I can't find it.

So if the author doesn't mind, could you forward it to me?
(chomig@***.edu)

Gabe
Message no. 2
From: shadowrn@*********.com (Valeu John EMFA)
Subject: Intro message
Date: Thu Jun 28 12:05:06 2001
> A couple weeks ago, during the Valeu John EFMA "dragon-PC" discussion,
> someone (I thought it was VJ, but I couldn't find the message) sent out an
> introductory letters to his players and CC'd the list.
>
> I was planning on doing something similar, and while I'm definitely making
> some changes, I wanted to plagarize some of it... unfortunately, I can't
> find the email message. I think I saved it someone so I would have access
> to it when the time came and now I can't find it.
>
> So if the author doesn't mind, could you forward it to me?
> (chomig@***.edu)
>
> Gabe
>
[Valeu John EMFA]
It wasn't me, but if it was, I probably deleted those messages.
Actually, what it was was the fact that I copied our 'disucussion'
(ie Flames)
and posted them to the list. That intro I wrote about SR is at the
begining of that.
If that's what you're talking about, I just checked and I do have
that.

So, you want it?

EMFA John Valeu
-AKA- TimeKeeper
"Two wrongs do not make a right."
"But 3 lefts do!"

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Intro message, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.