Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Chris Maxfield cmaxfiel@****.org.au
Subject: invisibility. Normal vision, low light, and thermal. page
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 19:40:38 +1000
At 21:58 5/08/99 -0700, Arcady wrote:
>Anyone got a page number that answers just exactly how much invisibility
>covers and where low light and thermal vision fit in.
>
> I can't find any solid refs in the archive but I distinctly
> remember this
>subject being discussed. So rather than open it up again if someone could be
>kind enough to help me with book references.

It's an area in the rules that's not black and white. There're no page
references that'll give you clear cut answers to your questions. You'll
just have to read the spell descriptions and the sorcery chapter and make
up your own mind.

For me: since Invisibility affects the mind and the paragraph under the
Indirect Illusion Spells heading on page 195 states that Indirect Illusion
Spells (such as Invisibility) only apply to either a person or an area
equal to the caster's MR in meters, and from the Invisibility spell
description, I'd say it covers one person and whatever he is carrying/
wearing. No more.

For low light: it's clear from the Illusion spells description on page 195
that you either see the person that you don't. It's all in the mind.
Lowlight vision has no affect on this.

For thermo: it's whether you consider thermo *normal* vision (it is for a
troll). If thermo is normal vision, then it is no defence against
Invisibility. If it isn't, then it's a full defense versus Invisibility.


Chris

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about invisibility. Normal vision, low light, and thermal. page, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.