Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: "Jason Carter, Nightstalker" <CARTER@***.EDU>
Subject: Invisible Deckers and Black IC Load
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1993 10:47:42 -0700
Quiktek:

Just as I feared. The mighty editors at FASA allowed a program to detect
personas hidden from personas (Scanner) but forgot to put in a program
that allows personas to hide form personas (Sleaze works on Acess, Barrier,
and Scanner IC, not personas sensor rating).

And you qouted:

>>What is the Load Rating of Black IC?
>> The load rating is the same rating as equivalent Grey IC.

Really useful. What's the equivalent Grey IC?

See Ya in Shadows,
Jason J Carter
The Nightstalker
Message no. 2
From: Todd Montgomery <tmont@****.WVU.EDU>
Subject: Invisible Deckers and Black IC Load
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1993 13:53:23 -0400
> From: "Jason Carter, Nightstalker" <CARTER@***.EDU>

> Just as I feared. The mighty editors at FASA allowed a program to detect
> personas hidden from personas (Scanner) but forgot to put in a program
> that allows personas to hide form personas (Sleaze works on Acess, Barrier,
> and Scanner IC, not personas sensor rating).

What a surprise! But it does say under sleaze that Sleaze defeats
Access, Barrier IC, and scanner _programs_. Now I remember why I
started to just use their system as a general basis.

>
> And you qouted:
>
> >>What is the Load Rating of Black IC?
> >> The load rating is the same rating as equivalent Grey IC.
>
> Really useful. What's the equivalent Grey IC?

I have no idea. That is what it said. I assume Killer or Blaster, though.

-- Quiktek
a.k.a. Todd Montgomery
tmont@****.wvu.edu
tmont@***.wvu.edu
un032507@*******.wvnet.edu

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Invisible Deckers and Black IC Load, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!