Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Schizi@***.com Schizi@***.com
Subject: Josie's Model (Was Re: Jak Koke E-Mail (Concerning the SRNovels)
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 19:52:25 EDT
In a message dated 7/17/99 8:07:34 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
Twist0059@***.com writes:

>
> > >Thanks Jon. BTW, I appreciate your work too! :-) So tell me,
> > >just who was the model that Les used for the cover art on R2?
> > >Anyway back to the question at hand for Jak....
> > >
> > It certainly wasn't Jon :]
> >
> > <grin>
> >
> > Bull
>
> Hey, if it was Jon, he's one fine lookin' woman. (I personally prefer the
> Josie Cruise B&W illo in a one of the later fiction chapters.)
>
>
In a chat (AOL has its previleges people :-) with Steve Kenson and Jon Szeto,
the pictures came up. Something like <Steve> "usually Talon wears something
under that armor vest, but.." and <Jon>"hey, Josie don't look like
that"
I figured they'd make a great team, the "low-cut crew"?
btw, make sure everyone keeps bugging Jon for his Josie novel, we really need
a babe with drones :-)
Message no. 2
From: Darrell L. Bowman darrell@******.dhr.state.nc.us
Subject: Josie's Model (Was Re: Jak Koke E-Mail (Concerning the SR Novels)
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 21:02:25 -0400
On 17 Jul 99, at 6:44, Bull wrote:

>> appreciate your work too! :-) So tell me, >just who was the model that Les
>> used for the cover art on R2? >Anyway back to the question at hand for
>> Jak....
>
> It certainly wasn't Jon :]
>
> <grin>

Hehe,.. yeah, no kiddin'. I've got my ideas. But I just wanted to
see if they'd tell :-)

---
Armor piercing rounds -- thanks guys you really shouldn't have.
-- Smilin's Jack, his cybereyes fogged up.

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Josie's Model (Was Re: Jak Koke E-Mail (Concerning the SRNovels), you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!