Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: loneeagle@********.co.uk (Lone Eagle)
Subject: Lionheart's Armour
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2003 19:05:18 +0000
At 07:17 PM 4/1/2003 +0100, Gurth wrote:
>If you're willing to rule that magical items stay magical even when the
>magic has gone away (sort of like an electrical device remaining an
>electrical device even when you take the batteries out) I think it should
>be possible. After all, it's magical :)

Which begs the question, what else survived between the ages while still
functioning, even to a fraction of its "normal" abilities?
What about the pen of Xeric the scribe? (let's see who remembers that :-) )
One has to wonder, did that do anything special before it was bronzed?
Has anyone seen any metal objects which have a strange sort of orangey
sheen to them? :D


--
Lone Eagle
"Hold up lads, I got an idea."

www.wyrmtalk.co.uk - Please be patient, this site is under construction

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GE d++(---) s++: a->? C++(+) US++ P! L E? W++ N o? K? w+ O! M- V? PS+ PE-()
Y PGP? t+@ 5++ X- R+>+++$>* tv b+++ DI++++ D+ G++ e+ h r* y+>+++++
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----

GCC0.2: y75>?.uk[NN] G87 S@:@@[SR] B+++ f+ RM(RR) rm++ rr++ l++(--) m- w
s+(+++) GM+++(-) A GS+(-) h++ LA+++ CG--- F c+
Message no. 2
From: sf_fuller@********.com.au (Simon & Fiona)
Subject: Lionheart's Armour
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2003 11:29:18 +1100
----- Original Message -----
From: Lone Eagle <loneeagle@********.co.uk>
To: Shadowrun Discussion <shadowrn@*****.dumpshock.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 6:05 AM
Subject: Re: Lionheart's Armour


> Has anyone seen any metal objects which have a strange sort of orangey
> sheen to them? :D

My first car did. I thought it was rust, but you might be on to something.
It did magically stop whenever I was in traffic.

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Lionheart's Armour, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.