Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Negative Pulse <negativepulse@********.COM>
Subject: FWD>> Listserv Humor
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 14:37:26 -0400
>Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 10:09:30 -0800
>Reply-To: Net Enhancements for Roleplaying Shadowrun
> <NERPS@********.ITRIBE.NET>
>Sender: Net Enhancements for Roleplaying Shadowrun
> <NERPS@********.ITRIBE.NET>
>From: Erik_Jameson@*****.COM
>Subject: FWD>> Listserv Humor
>To: NERPS@********.ITRIBE.NET
>
>FWD>> Listserv Humor
>To nerps@********.itribe.net
>
>
>A fellow co-worker at the office found this on one of his
>mailing lists. I thought it might be very amusing for
>everyone. Also, if someone wants to forward it to RN, where
>I'm sure they could use it, please go ahead. It also
>explains why I left RN a while back...;-)
>
>Erik
>*******************************************************************
>Q: How many list subscribers does it take to change a light
>bulb?
>
>A: 1,331
>
>
>1 to change the light bulb and to post to the mail list that
>they did it.
>
>14 to share similar experiences of changing light bulbs and
>how the
>light bulb could have been changed differently.
>
>7 to caution about the dangers of changing light bulbs.
>
>27 to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts about
>changing light
>bulbs.
>
>53 to flame the spell checkers
>
>156 to write to the list administrator complaining about the
>light
>bulb discussion and its inappropriateness to this mail list.
>
>41 to correct spelling in the spelling/grammar flames.
>
>109 to post that this list is not about light bulbs and to
>please take
>this email exchange to alt.lite.bulb
>
>203 to demand that cross posting to alt.grammar,
>alt.spelling and
>alt.punctuation about changing light bulbs be stopped.
>
>111 to defend the posting to this list saying that we are
>all use
>light bulbs and therefore the posts **are** relevant to this
>mail
>list.
>
>306 to debate which method of changing light bulbs is
>superior, where
>to buy the best light bulbs, what brand of light bulbs work
>best for
>this technique, and what brands are faulty.
>
>27 to post URLs where one can see examples of different
>light bulbs
>
>14 to post that the URLs were posted incorrectly, and to
>post
>corrected URLs.
>
>3 to post about links they found from the URLs that are
>relevant to
>this list which makes light bulbs relevant to this list.
>
>33 to concatenate all posts to date, then quote them
>including all
>headers and footers, and then add "Me Too."
>
>12 to post to the list that they are unsubscribing because
>they cannot
>handle the light bulb controversey.
>
>19 to quote the "Me Too's" to say, "Me Three."
>
>5 to suggest that posters request the light bulb FAQ.
>
>1 to propose new alt.change.lite.bulb newsgroup.
>
>47 to say this is just what alt.physic.cold_fusion was meant
>for,
>leave it here.
>
>143 votes for alt.lite.bulb.
>
>1 to point out that the correct number should be 1,332.
>
>1 to wonder if the person asking that makes it 1,333.
>
>6 to say the inability to deal with numbers shows the sorry
>state of
>education under the Republican/Democratic regimes.
>
>7 to argue on the educational budgets under
>Democrats/Republicans
>
>3 to blame Hillary Clinton.
>
>18 to flame the others.
>
>1 new subscriber to ask what the original question was and
>could someone
>bring him/her up to date?
>
>1 list owner to intervene.
>
>
Message no. 2
From: Droopy <droopy@*******.NB.NET>
Subject: Re: FWD>> Listserv Humor
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 1997 06:51:33 +0000
> From: Negative Pulse <negativepulse@********.COM>
> Subject: FWD>> Listserv Humor

<Snip humor>

ROFLMAO!


--Droopy
droopy@**.net

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Listserv Humor, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.