Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Strago strago@***.com
Subject: List Twonkyness, Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 00:55:14 -0500
When I tried to reply to a message, this is what I got:

Mail Delivery System wrote:

> This is the Postfix program at host fastjack.dumpshock.com.
>
> I'm sorry to have to inform you that the message returned
> below could not be delivered to one or more destinations.
>
> For further assistance, please contact <postmaster@*********.com>
>
> If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
> delete your own text from the message returned below.
>
> The Postfix program
>
> <shadowrn@*****.dumpshock.com>: mail for lists.dumpshock.com loops back to
> myself
>
> <SNIP Message>--
>

Just something twonky. In the To: field, it lists:
shadowrn@*****.dumpshock.com, for more information.

> --Strago
>
> In Italy for thirty years under the Borgias they had warfare, terror,
> murder, bloodshed - they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci and the
> Renaissance. In Switzerland they had brotherly
> love, five hundred years of democracy and peace, and what did they
> produce? The cuckoo clock!
> -Orson Welles
>
> SRGC v0.2 !SR1 SR2+ SR3++ h b++ B- UB- IE+ RN+ SRFF W+ sa++ ma++ ad+ m+
> (o++ d+) gm+ M P

--
--Strago

In Italy for thirty years under the Borgias they had warfare, terror, murder,
bloodshed - they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci and the Renaissance.
In Switzerland they had brotherly
love, five hundred years of democracy and peace, and what did they produce? The
cuckoo clock!
-Orson Welles

SRGC v0.2 !SR1 SR2+ SR3++ h b++ B- UB- IE+ RN+ SRFF W+ sa++ ma++ ad+ m+ (o++
d+) gm+ M P

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about List Twonkyness, Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.