Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Drekhead <drekhead@***.NET>
Subject: LOS and sustaining (was Re:FasaMike)
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 21:38:28 +0500
On 5 Nov 97 at 0:09, Spike wrote:

> And verily, did Chris Maxfield hastily scribble thusly...
> |While we're on the subject: For you people who allow a target to wander
> |out-of-view of the sustaining magician - how far do you allow the targets
> |to wander before the spell fails?
> In my case, you could have the spell cast in London, and it'd still
> work when you pulled into San Fransisco...
> I don't see the problem.
> (I see it as an umbilical cord that streches as far as it needs
> to...)
> After all, the casting mage DOES have the penalties for maintaining
> the spell, and is likely to drop it at the first sign of trouble at
> his end...

I tend to agree with Spike here, and that how I have always played
it. Like someone pointed out, spells like invisibility and mask would
be kind of stupid otherwise.

A flying saucer results when a nudist spills his coffee.


Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about LOS and sustaining (was Re:FasaMike), you may also be interested in:


These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.