Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Gurth <gurth@******.NL>
Subject: Re: Lucking out with SRCCG
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 1997 12:24:28 +0100
Loki said on 12:54/13 Aug 97...

> I don't know. I'd consider the SRCCG and most of the GC discussion to
> be on topic, or borderline at the worst. The CCG is just a new face
> for Shadowrun after all. :o)

Not sure if I should mention this, but Fro asked me last week what I
thought about the idea of setting up a new list for the CCG, when it's
out, the idea being that discussion of the CCG should be on the CCG list,
not on ShadowRN.

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
...who hates heatwaves
-> NERPS Project Leader & Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/plastic.html <-

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.1:
GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+ PE
Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Message no. 2
From: MC23 <mc23@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: Lucking out with SRCCG
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 1997 08:49:50 -0400
Gurth once dared to write,

>Not sure if I should mention this, but Fro asked me last week what I
>thought about the idea of setting up a new list for the CCG, when it's
>out, the idea being that discussion of the CCG should be on the CCG list,
>not on ShadowRN.

Paradox is it not?


<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

"If I was born in the 17th century, I wouldn't have to wax the van."
-Azreal Abyss, Goth Talk (SNL)

I am MC23
Message no. 3
From: David Buehrer <dbuehrer@****.ORG>
Subject: Re: Lucking out with SRCCG
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 1997 07:09:13 -0600
Gurth wrote:
|
| Not sure if I should mention this, but Fro asked me last week what I
| thought about the idea of setting up a new list for the CCG, when it's
| out, the idea being that discussion of the CCG should be on the CCG list,
| not on ShadowRN.

Hmm. If its as good a game as people have been saying, then a
seperate list would probably be a good idea. The good games generate
a lot of ideas (just look at what Shadowrun has done :) and with this
list's volume as high as it is allready....

-David
http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/1068/homepage.htm
--
"Creativity is allowing yourself to make mistakes. Art is knowing
which ones to keep."
Message no. 4
From: Skye Comstock <bilbo@****.NWLINK.COM>
Subject: Re: Lucking out with SRCCG
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 1997 08:07:24 -0800
>Not sure if I should mention this, but Fro asked me last week what I
>thought about the idea of setting up a new list for the CCG, when it's
>out, the idea being that discussion of the CCG should be on the CCG list,
>not on ShadowRN.

That'd be nice, then I could whine for free cards on a different list
with less people to annoy with OT posting. :] Of course, you'd get
crossposting every so often because the card game and the real
game would overlap...

-Skye
Message no. 5
From: Gurth <gurth@******.NL>
Subject: Re: Lucking out with SRCCG
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 1997 20:46:08 +0100
MC23 said on 8:49/14 Aug 97...

> >Not sure if I should mention this, but Fro asked me last week what I
> >thought about the idea of setting up a new list for the CCG, when it's
> >out, the idea being that discussion of the CCG should be on the CCG list,
> >not on ShadowRN.
>
> Paradox is it not?

Yeah, there's bound to be lots of overlap if the CCG were to gets its own
list, but OTOH if CCG discussions get rampant on ShadowRN there's bound to
be lots of "Frag you and the CCG you rode in on!" type posts...

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
...who hates heatwaves
-> NERPS Project Leader & Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/plastic.html <-

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.1:
GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+ PE
Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Message no. 6
From: "Mark A. Imbriaco" <mark@******.NET>
Subject: Re: Lucking out with SRCCG
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 1997 14:55:07 -0400
On Thu, 14 Aug 1997, Gurth wrote:

> MC23 said on 8:49/14 Aug 97...
>
> > >Not sure if I should mention this, but Fro asked me last week what I
> > >thought about the idea of setting up a new list for the CCG, when it's
> > >out, the idea being that discussion of the CCG should be on the CCG list,
> > >not on ShadowRN.
> >
> > Paradox is it not?
>
> Yeah, there's bound to be lots of overlap if the CCG were to gets its own
> list, but OTOH if CCG discussions get rampant on ShadowRN there's bound to
> be lots of "Frag you and the CCG you rode in on!" type posts...

I'll try and keep an eye on the S/N ratio and if a lot of
junk flows in about the CCG I'll spin up another list.

-Mark
Message no. 7
From: Loki <daddyjim@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: Lucking out with SRCCG
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 1997 12:22:44 -0700
---Gurth wrote:
>
> Not sure if I should mention this, but Fro asked me last week what I
> thought about the idea of setting up a new list for the CCG, when
it's
> out, the idea being that discussion of the CCG should be on the CCG
list,
> not on ShadowRN.

Probably not a bad idea once the CCG hits the stores. However, I'd
have to say list members on either side will have to be somewhat
leniant on cross posting as there will be obvious areas where the two
games overlap.

===

@>--,--'--- Loki <gamemstr@********.com>

Poisoned Elves: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr/

"You're calling me Bitch like it's a bad thing."
--> CrapGame during the Drive in the Country tournament.
_____________________________________________________________________
Sent by RocketMail. Get your free e-mail at http://www.rocketmail.com
Message no. 8
From: MC23 <mc23@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: Lucking out with SRCCG
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 1997 19:19:03 -0400
Mark A. Imbriaco once dared to write,

> I'll try and keep an eye on the S/N ratio and if a lot of
> junk flows in about the CCG I'll spin up another list.

My hero!^2


<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Ancient cultures believed that names held great power, personal names
more so and they were guarded very closely. To protect themselves, they
answered to another name, because if another discovered their real name,
it could be used against them.
History repeats itself.
Welcome to the Digital Age.
I am MC23

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Lucking out with SRCCG, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!