Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: snake.eyes@***.net (Snake Eyes)
Subject: Lurking Scrota
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 03:21:21 -0700
On 18 SEP 2002, Gurth wrote:

>Why does everyone who returns here after being away for a while think
>nobody will remember them? :) Now if you'd said "Nobody probably missed
>me," you'd be right -- at least as far as I'm concerned: I usually only
>realize someone went away when they return :)

and on 10 OCT 2002, Lone Eagle wrote:

>no more than about a quarter of the list actually post stuff, the rest are
>all just glowing pairs of eyes between the trees :-)

and on 11 OCT 2002, Robert Ennew wrote:

>I was once a lurker for a long time running (until I found my balls again
>& spoke up for the first time in a deep loud voice, making sure they've
>dropped enough that'll never look back & have them recede back up into the
>dark recesses of a rapidly shrinking scrotum ever again), their time will
>come, hopefully soon, when they join the rest of the sharks & join in on
>the feeding frenzy that is (consisting of) the list.
>
>([G]row some balls you pussy's, & speak up, stop actin' like a pack of big
>wu[Z]'s)

<DELURKING>

Judging from the archives, it's been around 14 months since my last post,
and (as Gurth has so eloquently observed above) I doubt anybody is missing
me, even if my absence has managed to somehow not go unnoticed. But that
is neither here nor there, as -- while I often had occasion to contribute
to the quality of the stimulating discourse -- I never considered myself a
community insider anyway.

It doesn't really seem like it's been that long, mostly because I reply in
spirit, if not in word, to those posts I actually read that do evoke and
warrant such a response -- though it has recently come to my attention that
I am not in fact receiving 100% of all messages posted (I occasionally get
replies to messages the original posts of which never show up).

I have any number of reasons for not posting more often -- an ongoing
search for gainful employment, appeasement of my girlfriend, and
participation in an active Twilight:2000 campaign are chief among them. I
also adhere to advice received as a boy from my great-grandfather: "If you
don't have anything to say, keep your mouth shut." [1]

However, dear sir -- in reference to your misplaced concern with the
specifics of my big, hairy beanbag -- I can assure your that my testicles
have long ago fully descended, and remain happily so. Further, I am quite
confident that the remainder of the glowing-eyed lurkers amongst the trees
who do sport nut-sacks will appreciate your refrainment from further
comment on matters regarding our genitalia just as much as those
subscribers (active or otherwise) not so fortunately endowed.

To bring this ever so slightly back on topic [2], and, in so doing, herald
my triumphant return to active membership in the ongoing ShadowRN
discussion: Has any work been done on the SR Geek Code [3] in the last
three and a half years? Any interest in revising/revisiting it in order to
take into account any of the more recent developments in the SR
uni/metaverse? I am woefully out of touch with the state of affairs
post-2060 (or post-collapse of FASA), would but relish the opportunity to
collaborate on such an endeavor.

Kind Regards,

~ Snake Eyes

[1] Originally taught to me by MSGT W. H. Stein, US Army (Ret.), this maxim
later evolved into Rule for Peaceful Cohabitation #3: "If you don't have
anything nice to say, put a [male reproductive organ] in your mouth."

[2] Is there such thing as an "ObSR:" on this list?

[3] Currently found online at
<http://mailer.fsu.edu/~bmonroe/Shadowrun/SRGeek.html>;; only about three of
the original contributors still hanging around the list, by my estimate.

________________________________________________

"Hey, at least I'm not a troll!"
-- Slogan on T-shirt worn by
my ghoul/ex-merc PC.
________________________________________________
Message no. 2
From: loneeagle2061@*******.com (Lone Eagle)
Subject: Lurking Scrota
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 11:09:08 +0000
>However, dear sir -- in reference to your misplaced concern with the
>specifics of my big, hairy beanbag <Snip>

I know that I intended no offense, merely a light needling, with my comment.

>To bring this ever so slightly back on topic [2], and, in so doing, herald
>my triumphant return to active membership in the ongoing ShadowRN
>discussion: Has any work been done on the SR Geek Code [3] in the last
>three and a half years? Any interest in revising/revisiting it in order to
>take into account any of the more recent developments in the SR
>uni/metaverse? I am woefully out of touch with the state of affairs
>post-2060 (or post-collapse of FASA), would but relish the opportunity to
>collaborate on such an endeavor.

To my knowledge, no, nothing has changed in a long while... As to interest
certainly (other than needing updating) mine is certainly looking a little
sparse.

_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
Message no. 3
From: snake.eyes@***.net (Snake Eyes)
Subject: Lurking Scrota
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 04:36:51 -0700
At 11:09 AM 10/11/02 +0000, Lone Eagle wrote:

>I know that I intended no offense, merely a light needling, with my comment.

Indeed, I took no offense. In retrospect, my previous post should have
been sent replete with those little smiley-face emoticons all over.

>>To bring this ever so slightly back on topic [2], and, in so doing,
>>herald my triumphant return to active membership in the ongoing ShadowRN
>>discussion: Has any work been done on the SR Geek Code [3] in the last
>>three and a half years? Any interest in revising/revisiting it in order
>>to take into account any of the more recent developments in the SR
>>uni/metaverse? I am woefully out of touch with the state of affairs
>>post-2060 (or post-collapse of FASA), would but relish the opportunity to
>>collaborate on such an endeavor.
>
>To my knowledge, no, nothing has changed in a long while... As to interest
>certainly (other than needing updating) mine is certainly looking a little
>sparse.

Well, it was just a thought. I'll give it a few days to see if anyone else
out there has any greater interest. Doesn't really appear as though
anybody is using it anyway.

~ Snake Eyes

________________________________________________

"Hey, at least I'm not a troll!"
-- Slogan on T-shirt worn by
my ghoul/ex-merc PC.
________________________________________________
Message no. 4
From: shannon@*****.co.za (Shannon Buys)
Subject: Lurking Scrota
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 14:08:17 +0200
Snake Eyes Wrote:
>Well, it was just a thought. I'll give it a few days to see if anyone else
>out there has any greater interest. Doesn't really appear as though
>anybody is using it anyway.

Ahem!!

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE-----
GAT/GIT d- s-: a24 C++++$ L+ !P W+++ N+ K? w M-- PS+ PE++ Y+ t--- 5? X
R++>+$
!tv b++ DI++ D++ G e^ h--- r++ x+++
SR3++ h--- b++>++++ !B UB>+ IE+ RNLST++(DSF) !W dk++ ma- m+(o+++) gm+++ M-
P++
------END GEEK CODE------

Is this correctly formatted?
Message no. 5
From: loneeagle2061@*******.com (Lone Eagle)
Subject: Lurking Scrota
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 12:16:41 +0000
>From: Snake Eyes <snake.eyes@***.net>
>>To my knowledge, no, nothing has changed in a long while... As to interest
>>certainly (other than needing updating) mine is certainly looking a little
>>sparse.
>
>Well, it was just a thought. I'll give it a few days to see if anyone else
>out there has any greater interest. Doesn't really appear as though
>anybody is using it anyway.

Well mine will probably be going into my .sig when I finally change
addresses. Along with stuff like Blackadder, Python and ISIRTA quotes
probably.
Incidentally punctuation on the above paragraph should have included a stop
after the first certainly.

_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
Message no. 6
From: loneeagle2061@*******.com (Lone Eagle)
Subject: Lurking Scrota
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 12:44:56 +0000
>-----BEGIN GEEK CODE-----
>GAT/GIT d- s-: a24 C++++$ L+ !P W+++ N+ K? w M-- PS+ PE++ Y+ t--- 5? X
>R++>+$
>!tv b++ DI++ D++ G e^ h--- r++ x+++
>SR3++ h--- b++>++++ !B UB>+ IE+ RNLST++(DSF) !W dk++ ma- m+(o+++) gm+++ M-
>P++
>------END GEEK CODE------
>
>Is this correctly formatted?

You need to specify your version for a start. And I'm not sure about this
bit:

"RNLST++(DSF)"

RN would be this list, LST would be an unspecified list, if you're saying
"I'm a list member on ShadowRN" and "I read all my mail and post at least
once a day on (another list) but that varies to "DSF"" then there should be

a space between the N and the L, if you're saying that "I read all my mail
and post at least once a day on ShadowRN but that varies to "DSF"" then you

can get rid of LST and I really don't know what DSF means...

To my knowledge (of course having one of the authors around is a bonus) list
membership should be listed more like this, (if you are trying to list
multiple lists):

"RN++>++++ LST+ STK+"

Which is a snippet of my own so please feel free to inform me of the fact
that my rhetoric seems more like rectumric.
I probably should put it more as "RN++>!" translated to something like
"I
read all my mail and post at least once a day on ShadowRN but someday I want
to have more posts than Gurth" rather than "I read... but someday I want to
be Admin" but that isn't actually covered so...

That's going by Version 0.22, whether that's been superseded (or has
superseded the version you used) I'm not sure.
But beyond that I can read it so...
:-)

_________________________________________________________________
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com
Message no. 7
From: Jconstable@*****.com (Jconstable@*****.com)
Subject: Lurking Scrota
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 22:44:56 +0100 (BST)
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Shannon Buys wrote:

> Snake Eyes Wrote:
> >Well, it was just a thought. I'll give it a few days to see if anyone else
> >out there has any greater interest. Doesn't really appear as though
> >anybody is using it anyway.
>
> Ahem!!
>
> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE-----
> GAT/GIT d- s-: a24 C++++$ L+ !P W+++ N+ K? w M-- PS+ PE++ Y+ t--- 5? X
> R++>+$
> !tv b++ DI++ D++ G e^ h--- r++ x+++
> SR3++ h--- b++>++++ !B UB>+ IE+ RNLST++(DSF) !W dk++ ma- m+(o+++) gm+++ M-
> P++
> ------END GEEK CODE------
>
> Is this correctly formatted?
>

I'll see your ahem, and raise you a hmph!
OK, so I dont post all that often but...
(heres hoping I got the code right when I did it a year or so ago... :-)
--
john@*****.net http://www.kript.net/shadowrun
SRGC SR1+ SR3++ !SR2 h b++ B--- UB IE+ RN+ !W ma+++ gm M-- P-
"He's an oversexed shark-wrestling wage mage haunted by an iconic dead American
confidante. She's a bloodthirsty Bolivian Valkyrie with her own daytime radio
talk show. They're Shadowrunners!"
Message no. 8
From: Gurth@******.nl (Gurth)
Subject: Lurking Scrota
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 11:36:53 +0200
According to Jconstable@*****.com, on Fri, 11 Oct 2002 the word on the street was...

> I'll see your ahem, and raise you a hmph!
> OK, so I dont post all that often but...
> (heres hoping I got the code right when I did it a year or so ago... :-)

And FWIW, here's what I came up with when looking through v0.22:

SRGC SR1+ SR2+ SR3++ h++ b+++ B81 UB+ IE- RN+++ NERPS W+++(++++)
dk(+) m+ gm--(+) M P(+)

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
I know all this and more
-> Probably NAGEE Editor * ShadowRN GridSec * Triangle Virtuoso <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://plastic.dumpshock.com <-

GC3.12: GAT/! d- s:- !a>? C++(---) UL+ P(+) L++ E W--(++) N o? K w(--)
O V? PS+ PE@ Y PGP- t- 5++ X(+) R+++$ tv+(++) b++@ DI- D+ G+ e h! !r y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998
Message no. 9
From: robertennew@*****.com.au (Robert Ennew)
Subject: Lurking Scrota
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 14:22:35 +1000 (EST)
--- Snake Eyes <snake.eyes@***.net> wrote: >
> <snipett>
> However, dear sir -- in reference to your misplaced
> concern with the
> specifics of my big, hairy beanbag -- I can assure
> your that my testicles
> have long ago fully descended, and remain happily
> so.

I couldn't really give a rat's arse about your
testis,mine are fine too I was only using them as an
example(not literally though, don't be fraggin'
stupid, It's an aussie/occa figure of speech to
motivate you into action :) so as to rile everyone up
(It obviously rattled your chain;), I only care that
my calous comment had the desired effect, well you
posted didn't ya' LOL ;)

> Further, I am quite
> confident that the remainder of the glowing-eyed
> lurkers amongst the trees
> who do sport nut-sacks will appreciate your
> refrainment from further
> comment on matters regarding our genitalia just as
> much as those
> subscribers (active or otherwise) not so fortunately
> endowed.

I'm so sorry, didn't think you were all so sensitive,
oh well, too bad so sad ;) It's already been said &
done now, I just wish alot more people like you would
post to defend their honour, thus having a effect
still. I apologise to those I upset, especially to the
females on the list, I hope I haven't offended any
female sensitivities, It's hard to distinguish in
matrix unless stated, obvious or maybe by name (even
that's not foolproof).

> Kind Regards,
>
> ~ Snake Eyes
>
> [1] Originally taught to me by MSGT W. H. Stein, US
> Army (Ret.), this maxim
> later evolved into Rule for Peaceful Cohabitation
> #3: "If you don't have
> anything nice to say, put a [male reproductive
> organ] in your mouth."

Is that why G.I. jane says "suck my dick"
>
> [2] Is there such thing as an "ObSR:" on this list?
>
> [3] Currently found online at
>
<http://mailer.fsu.edu/~bmonroe/Shadowrun/SRGeek.html>;;
> only about three of
> the original contributors still hanging around the
> list, by my estimate.
>
> ________________________________________________
>
> "Hey, at least I'm not a troll!"
> -- Slogan on T-shirt worn by
> my ghoul/ex-merc PC.
> ________________________________________________
>
wait till I get a hold of that festy bastard (GZ)

http://mobile.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Messenger for SMS
- Always be connected to your Messenger Friends
Message no. 10
From: snake.eyes@***.net (Snake Eyes)
Subject: Lurking Scrota
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 21:44:58 -0700
At 02:22 PM 10/15/2002 +1000, Robert Ennew wrote:

>I'm so sorry, didn't think you were all so sensitive

[SNIP]

It takes much more than that to actually offend me -- but I wouldn't
recommend trying, lest ye incur the wrath of GridSec. ;) I was mostly
being facetious, I just forgot to go back & put in all the smileys before I
hit SEND.

I do agree that the ratio of actively participating members around here has
taken a bit of a nose-dive. That may be related to the fact that I may not
be the only one not getting all the messages. I know there is stuff in the
archive that never shows up here.

Well, I'm back. And you only have yerself to blame. ;)

~ Snake Eyes

----------------------------------------------------------------------
GCC0.2:
y71.us[SFO] G82 SMO/PA:Hf/j[T2K] B+ f-(--) RM rm++ rr++ l-(+) m-(+) w
s+++@ GM+(-) A-(+) GS+(-) h(++) p>+ LA!(--) C+ CG-- F+(-) c(---)>+
----------------------------------------------------------------------
______________________________________________________________________

"Hey, at least I'm not a troll!"
-- Slogan on T-shirt worn by
my ghoul/ex-merc PC.
______________________________________________________________________

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Lurking Scrota, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.