From: | Tzeentch tzeentch666@*********.net |
---|---|
Subject: | M60 (was Re: State of the Game (mildly long)) |
Date: | Wed, 12 Apr 2000 14:18:32 -0700 |
> On Wed, 12 Apr 2000 20:25:45 +0200 "Gurth" <gurth@******.nl> writes:
> <SNIP>
> > I don't see the problem with that. A Mk. III need not be
> > automatically
> > better than a Mk. II, I'd say -- there are plenty of ways in which a
> > newer
> > version can actually be worse than the thing it's supposedly an
> > improvement on. (Anyone here know what an M60A2 Starship is? :)
>
> Isn't M60A2 the designation of a machine gun? (Sometimes known as, I
> think, "the hog" or "the pig") I'd guess that
"starship" was a reference
> to an attempt to fix the M60's ammo feed problem that resulted in
> misfires.
Well, that too. But he was referring to the overly complex tank with that
designation. ;)
Strangely enough, there are a assload of M-60s still in service. We used
them in a FEX (Field Exercise) when I was in Ft. Huachuca. One our Sgts.
(Sgt. Kill was is name -no shit), at the end of the exercise, picked up two
of them (now, this guy was short but STRONG) and starting firing away. It
was VERY cool ;) and since it was at night it was like a live-action Rambo
movie.
I never fired it (though I had to help clean them!) since I was the squad
commo guy.
It's heavy, I'll give it that...
Ken
---------------------------
There's a war out there, old friend, a world war. And it's not about who's
got the most bullets, it's about who controls the information. What we see
and hear, how we work, what we think, it's all about the information!
Cosmo, 'Sneakers'